Search in:



Docket # : Open Date : Divisions :
CLEAN ENERGY DIVISION / PRIMARY
Case Status : Last Update :
Case Caption :
Showing result(s) 1 - 358 of 358
 Docket #Document TitleFolderUploaded ByDescriptionPosted Date
QO24020126- [2024-06-12] - GeoExchange Comments on Energy Master Plan COMMENTSBPU Staff[2024-06-12] - GeoExchange Comments on Energy Master Plan06/12/2024
QO24020126- 2024 06 12 ACEEE COMMENTS ON BPU EMP COMMENTSBPU Staff2024 06 12 ACEEE COMMENTS ON BPU EMP06/13/2024
QO24020126- 2024 EMP RECO COMMENTS - FINAL COMMENTSBPU Staff2024 EMP RECO COMMENTS - FINAL06/13/2024
QO24020126- 2024.06.05 Comments on New Jersey Energy Master Plan - Virtual Peaker COMMENTSBPU Staff2024.06.05 Comments on New Jersey Energy Master Plan - Virtual Peaker06/10/2024
QO24020126- 2024-06-12 TGC NJBPU EMP RFI Comments COMMENTSBPU Staff2024-06-12 TGC NJBPU EMP RFI Comments06/12/2024
QO24020126- 2024-6-7-QO24020126-NJ-2024-EMP-FINAL ROBERT ERICKSON COMMENTSBPU Staff2024-6-7-QO24020126-NJ-2024-EMP-FINAL ROBERT ERICKSON06/11/2024
QO24020126- 2024EMP_NJEJA-ICC COMMENTSBPU Staff2024EMP_NJEJA-ICC06/12/2024
QO24020126- 2406 Sealed New Jersey Energy Master Plan Comments COMMENTSBPU Staff2406 Sealed New Jersey Energy Master Plan Comments06/12/2024
QO24020126- 240612 Comments on 2024 Energy Master Plan - RNG Coalition COMMENTSBPU Staff240612 Comments on 2024 Energy Master Plan - RNG Coalition06/12/2024
QO24020126- 5.13.24 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - PUBLIC HEARING QUESTIONS RFI - FINAL NOTICESBPU Staff5.13.24 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - PUBLIC HEARING QUESTIONS RFI - FINAL05/14/2024
QO24020126- 5.20.24 2024 EMP PUBLIC HEARING 1 PPT FINAL CORRESPONDENCEBPU Staff5.20.24 2024 EMP PUBLIC HEARING 1 PPT FINAL05/29/2024
QO24020126- 5.21.24 2024 EMP PUBLIC HEARING 2 PPT - FINAL CORRESPONDENCEBPU Staff5.21.24 2024 EMP PUBLIC HEARING 2 PPT - FINAL05/29/2024
QO24020126- 5.28.24 2024 EMP PUBLIC HEARING 3 PPT SLIDES - FINAL CORRESPONDENCEBPU Staff5.28.24 2024 EMP PUBLIC HEARING 3 PPT SLIDES - FINAL05/29/2024
QO24020126- 6.10.24 BPU TESTIMONY FINAL TESTIMONYBPU Staff6.10.24 BPU TESTIMONY FINAL06/12/2024
QO24020126- 6.12.24 - 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTS FINAL COMMENTSBPU Staff6.12.24 - 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTS FINAL06/06/2024
QO24020126- 6-12-24 SierraClub EMP final COMMENTSBPU Staff6-12-24 SierraClub EMP final06/12/2024
QO24020126- ACE - Comments to EMP Update - QO24020126 - 6-12-2024 COMMENTSBPU StaffACE - Comments to EMP Update - QO24020126 - 6-12-202406/12/2024
QO24020126- ACE - COMMENTS TO EMP UPDATE - QO24020126 - 6-12-2024 COMMENTSBPU StaffACE - COMMENTS TO EMP UPDATE - QO24020126 - 6-12-202406/13/2024
QO24020126- ACP MAREC NJ Energy Master Plan Comments June 12 2024 COMMENTSBPU StaffACP MAREC NJ Energy Master Plan Comments June 12 202406/12/2024
QO24020126- BPU Submittal request COMMENTSBPU StaffBPU Submittal request06/11/2024
QO24020126- CARLIN EMP Talking Points 2024-May 29 COMMENTSBPU StaffCARLIN EMP Talking Points 2024-May 2905/29/2024
QO24020126- CCANJ 2024 EMP COMMENTS 2024 COMMENTSBPU StaffCCANJ 2024 EMP COMMENTS 202406/13/2024
QO24020126- ChargEVC Comments re 2019 NJ EMP (Docket No. QO24020126)_F COMMENTSBPU StaffChargEVC Comments re 2019 NJ EMP (Docket No. QO24020126)_F06/12/2024
QO24020126- CLEANDQO – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JODE HILLMAN COMMENTSBPU StaffCLEANDQO – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JODE HILLMAN06/10/2024
QO24020126- COA 2024 EMP Comments_FINAL COMMENTSBPU StaffCOA 2024 EMP Comments_FINAL06/12/2024
QO24020126- Comments Energy Master Plan Defend Brigantine Beach Inc and Downbeach 6.11.24 COMMENTSBPU StaffComments Energy Master Plan Defend Brigantine Beach Inc and Downbeach 6.11.2406/11/2024
QO24020126- Comments from MW on BPU's 2024 EMP Update 6-12-24 COMMENTSBPU StaffComments from MW on BPU's 2024 EMP Update 6-12-2406/12/2024
QO24020126- Comments on BPU Energy Master Plan FINAL COMMENTSBPU StaffComments on BPU Energy Master Plan FINAL06/12/2024
QO24020126- Comments on EMP '24 COMMENTSBPU StaffComments on EMP '2406/12/2024
QO24020126- Comments on Energy Master Plan update re_ Transportation COMMENTSBPU StaffComments on Energy Master Plan update re_ Transportation06/12/2024
QO24020126- COVER LETTER COMMENTSBPU StaffCOVER LETTER06/13/2024
QO24020126- Cover Letter EMP COMMENTSBPU StaffCOVER LETTER EMP06/12/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 - JOANN HERBST COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 - JOANN HERBST06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - BILL LEAVENS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - BILL LEAVENS06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MARGARET NAVITSKI COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MARGARET NAVITSKI06/06/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MICHAEL LOMBARDI COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MICHAEL LOMBARDI06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ALEX STAVIS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ALEX STAVIS06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ALLA JENNINGS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ALLA JENNINGS06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - AMY GREENE COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - AMY GREENE06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ANDREW COLLETTO COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ANDREW COLLETTO06/03/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ANGELA GOLDMAN COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ANGELA GOLDMAN06/03/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ANGIE F COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ANGIE F06/06/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ANN T COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ANN T06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ANN THOMAS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ANN THOMAS06/06/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ANNE JOHNSTON COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ANNE JOHNSTON06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ANNETTE MIKALOUSKAS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ANNETTE MIKALOUSKAS06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - BARBARA HALPERN COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - BARBARA HALPERN06/12/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - BEN POTASHNICK COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - BEN POTASHNICK06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - BERNADETTE MONARI COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - BERNADETTE MONARI06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - BOB HARTMAN COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - BOB HARTMAN06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - BRIAN HAUCK COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - BRIAN HAUCK06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - CARA LANE COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - CARA LANE06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - CHARMAINE ROMAN COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - CHARMAINE ROMAN06/03/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - CHERYL MATTHEWS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - CHERYL MATTHEWS06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - CHRISTINE KOEHLER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - CHRISTINE KOEHLER06/06/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - COLLEN SPEER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - COLLEN SPEER06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - DANIEL WEISS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - DANIEL WEISS06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - DAVE SIMMS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - DAVE SIMMS06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - DAVID CALDERON COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - DAVID CALDERON06/03/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - DENISE LINISINBIGLER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - DENISE LINISINBIGLER06/17/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - DONNA ENNIS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - DONNA ENNIS06/03/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - EDIE SADOWSKI COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - EDIE SADOWSKI06/03/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - EDWARD ADLER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - EDWARD ADLER06/06/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - EDWARD REICHMAN COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - EDWARD REICHMAN06/03/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - EILEEN DUNN COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - EILEEN DUNN06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ELISE Y COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ELISE Y06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ELIZABETH DE PADOVA COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ELIZABETH DE PADOVA06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ELIZABETH HAMBLET COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ELIZABETH HAMBLET06/25/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ELIZABETH RALEIGH COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ELIZABETH RALEIGH06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ELLEN MARTIN COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ELLEN MARTIN06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ELYSE ASCH COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ELYSE ASCH06/06/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - FRED FALL COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - FRED FALL06/06/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - FREDERICK REIMER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - FREDERICK REIMER06/03/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - GEORGE BOURLOTOS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - GEORGE BOURLOTOS06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - GEORGE KOUTSOURADIS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - GEORGE KOUTSOURADIS06/06/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - HOLLY COX COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - HOLLY COX06/06/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - INGA ROBBINS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - INGA ROBBINS06/03/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JAMES SHIFFER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JAMES SHIFFER06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JANET RAUSHCER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JANET RAUSHCER06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JARRETT CLOUD COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JARRETT CLOUD06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JEANETTER YORK COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JEANETTER YORK06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JENNA P COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JENNA P06/06/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JENNIFER TOMLINSON COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JENNIFER TOMLINSON06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JOAN GILLEN COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JOAN GILLEN06/06/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JOANN RAMOS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JOANN RAMOS06/03/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JOANNE GIBBONS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JOANNE GIBBONS06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JOHN WHEELER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JOHN WHEELER06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JORDAN KLOTZ COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JORDAN KLOTZ06/06/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JUDY FAIRLESS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JUDY FAIRLESS06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JULIA CRANMER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - JULIA CRANMER06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - KATHY BROOKS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - KATHY BROOKS06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - KATHY FLOCCO-MCMASTER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - KATHY FLOCCO-MCMASTER06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - KATHY HART COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - KATHY HART06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - KERRY HECK COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - KERRY HECK06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - LAURENCE ANOUNA COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - LAURENCE ANOUNA06/03/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - LAWRENCE BROWN COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - LAWRENCE BROWN06/03/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - LEANNE BENNET COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - LEANNE BENNET06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - LEE EVANS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - LEE EVANS06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - LESLIE LERCH COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - LESLIE LERCH06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MAKI MURAKAMI COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MAKI MURAKAMI06/06/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MARGARET HARTWELL COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MARGARET HARTWELL06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MARIA SANTELLI COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MARIA SANTELLI06/03/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MARY SMITH COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MARY SMITH06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MARZIO GOBBO COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MARZIO GOBBO06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MERVYN TURNER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MERVYN TURNER06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - NANCY M FRANCY COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - NANCY M FRANCY06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - PAM MOUNT COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - PAM MOUNT06/06/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - PAMELA BARROWAY COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - PAMELA BARROWAY06/11/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - PAT RITCHTER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - PAT RITCHTER06/06/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - PATRICIA HARRIS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - PATRICIA HARRIS06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - RICHARD MASON COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - RICHARD MASON06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - RITA WARDE COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - RITA WARDE06/17/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ROBERT CZEKAJ COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ROBERT CZEKAJ06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ROBERT FILA COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ROBERT FILA06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ROBERT SZUTER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ROBERT SZUTER06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ROSEANN AMBROSIO COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ROSEANN AMBROSIO06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - SANDRA LUBRANO COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - SANDRA LUBRANO06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - SHERRIE ZEMANITATIS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - SHERRIE ZEMANITATIS06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - STACEY ATHERAS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - STACEY ATHERAS06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - STEPHANIE HAZELTON COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - STEPHANIE HAZELTON06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - SUSAN CHENELLE COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - SUSAN CHENELLE06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - SUSAN EKSTEIN COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - SUSAN EKSTEIN06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - THERESA THORSEN COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - THERESA THORSEN06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - THOMAS J CUSMANO COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - THOMAS J CUSMANO06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - THOMAS J. CUSMANO COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - THOMAS J. CUSMANO06/03/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - TONY ALEXANDER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - TONY ALEXANDER06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - TOYOSI DICKSON COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - TOYOSI DICKSON06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - TRACEY BRINK COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - TRACEY BRINK06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - TRACEY STEPHENS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - TRACEY STEPHENS06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - VIC SYTZKO COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - VIC SYTZKO06/03/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - WILLIAM RILLING COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - WILLIAM RILLING06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– ALBERT VALERI COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– ALBERT VALERI06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN –ALEXIS LANGELOTTI COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN –ALEXIS LANGELOTTI06/12/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– BARBARA TILLMAN COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– BARBARA TILLMAN06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– CAROL BOZZUFFI COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– CAROL BOZZUFFI06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– CASEY SMALL COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– CASEY SMALL06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– DAVID TEMPLE COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– DAVID TEMPLE06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– ERIC NUSSBAUM COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– ERIC NUSSBAUM06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– FRANK CREAGH COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– FRANK CREAGH06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– FREDERICK REIMER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– FREDERICK REIMER06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– JACKIE RUSSO COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– JACKIE RUSSO06/11/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– JOSEPH KAROL COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– JOSEPH KAROL06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– KIRK FROST COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– KIRK FROST06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN -MARIA ESCHE COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN -MARIA ESCHE06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– MARIAN ZELAZNY COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– MARIAN ZELAZNY06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– MARIE ONEILL COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– MARIE ONEILL06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– MARTY DOYLE COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– MARTY DOYLE06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– MARY BETH FEENEY COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– MARY BETH FEENEY06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– MARYELLEN MCCABE COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– MARYELLEN MCCABE06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– PATRICIA MUELLER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– PATRICIA MUELLER06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– PETE BALDWIN COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– PETE BALDWIN06/14/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN –SHILOH JAKOWLEW COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN –SHILOH JAKOWLEW06/12/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– SOPHIA ARENA COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– SOPHIA ARENA06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– TARA PRIDY COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– TARA PRIDY06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– TERI KIRCKOF COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– TERI KIRCKOF06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN –THOMAS ZVOLENSKY COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN –THOMAS ZVOLENSKY06/12/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– WILMA WEVER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN– WILMA WEVER06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–ANNETTE COOMBER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–ANNETTE COOMBER06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–BHARAT ADARKAR COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–BHARAT ADARKAR06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–BLAIR BUCK COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–BLAIR BUCK06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–BRIGID BANDOMER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–BRIGID BANDOMER06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–ELAINE PATTERSON COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–ELAINE PATTERSON06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–JOANNE VANDEGRIFT COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–JOANNE VANDEGRIFT06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–JUSTIN AGINS COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–JUSTIN AGINS06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–LEANNE BENNETT COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–LEANNE BENNETT06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–M ROSSNER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–M ROSSNER06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–MARGARET BAGLEY COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–MARGARET BAGLEY06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–MARIE HERRON COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–MARIE HERRON06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–MONICA JELONNEK COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–MONICA JELONNEK06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–NO COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–NORMAN DAVID06/12/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–PENNY CAMPBELL COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–PENNY CAMPBELL06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–RALPH BILLICK COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–RALPH BILLICK06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–RENEE BRUEN COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–RENEE BRUEN06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–STEPHEN WYZYKIEWICZ COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN–STEPHEN WYZYKIEWICZ06/10/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN-WILLIAM VACHULA COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN-WILLIAM VACHULA06/07/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NO. QO24020126—2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ELISSA HOEGER COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO24020126—2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ELISSA HOEGER06/03/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET NUMBER_ QO24020126 - JOHN SCHWARZ COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NUMBER_ QO24020126 - JOHN SCHWARZ06/13/2024
QO24020126- DOCKET QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - DENISE LYTLE COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - DENISE LYTLE06/03/2024
QO24020126- EDF_NJ_2024 EMP Comments COMMENTSBPU StaffEDF_NJ_2024 EMP Comments06/11/2024
QO24020126- EEA-NJ Energy Master Plan 2024 Public Stakeholder Comments COMMENTSBPU StaffEEA-NJ Energy Master Plan 2024 Public Stakeholder Comments 06/11/2024
QO24020126- ELEC Combined Submission 6-12-24 COMMENTSBPU StaffELEC Combined Submission 6-12-2406/12/2024
QO24020126- EMP Comments 6.12.24 COMMENTSBPU StaffEMP Comments 6.12.2406/12/2024
QO24020126- EMP Comments to NJBPU Clean Water Action.June 2024 COMMENTSBPU StaffEMP Comments to NJBPU Clean Water Action.June 202406/10/2024
QO24020126- EMP NJBPU Written Comments Waterspirit_June2024 COMMENTSBPU StaffEMP NJBPU Written Comments Waterspirit_June202406/12/2024
QO24020126- EMP Rise Comment 6.12.2024_Final COMMENTSBPU StaffEMP Rise Comment 6.12.2024_Final06/12/2024
QO24020126- EMP Talking Points 2024 COMMENTSBPU StaffEMP Talking Points 202405/29/2024
QO24020126- EMP Talking Points 2024 COMMENTSBPU StaffEMP Talking Points 202405/29/2024
QO24020126- EMP UPDATE COMMENTS COMMENTSBPU StaffEMP UPDATE COMMENTS06/12/2024
QO24020126- EmpowerNJ Comments to NJBPU on 2024 EMP Update Final COMMENTSBPU StaffEmpowerNJ Comments to NJBPU on 2024 EMP Update Final06/12/2024
QO24020126- EmpowerNJ Comments to NJBPU Regarding Transportation - 2024 Energy Master Plan Update COMMENTSBPU StaffEmpowerNJ Comments to NJBPU Regarding Transportation - 2024 Energy Master Plan Update06/12/2024
QO24020126- ENERGY MASTER PLAN - HEARING #4 PUBLIC NOTICE - MARCH 22 2024 NOTICESBPU StaffENERGY MASTER PLAN - HEARING #4 PUBLIC NOTICE - MARCH 22 202403/25/2024
QO24020126- ENERGY MASTER PLAN - PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICESBPU StaffENERGY MASTER PLAN - PUBLIC NOTICE03/11/2024
QO24020126- EVgo_Comments_2024_EMP COMMENTSBPU StaffEVgo_Comments_2024_EMP06/12/2024
QO24020126- FuelCell Energy Comments in Response to 2024 EMP 6.12.2024 COMMENTSBPU StaffFuelCell Energy Comments in Response to 2024 EMP 6.12.202406/12/2024
QO24020126- FW_ [EXTERNAL] EMPOWERNJ COMMENTS ON 2024 EMP UPDATE COMMENTSBPU StaffFW_ [EXTERNAL] EMPOWERNJ COMMENTS ON 2024 EMP UPDATE06/13/2024
QO24020126- FW_ [EXTERNAL] PLEASE SUPPORT CLEAN ENERGY (DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN ) COMMENTSBPU StaffFW_ [EXTERNAL] PLEASE SUPPORT CLEAN ENERGY (DOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN )09/03/2024
QO24020126- FWDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MARY FAUST COMMENTSBPU StaffFWDOCKET NO. QO24020126 – 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - MARY FAUST06/10/2024
QO24020126- HIGH COST OF NJ GAS UTILITIES' LPP REPLACEMENT PROGRAMS - SYNAPSE NON-DOCKETED MATTERSBPU StaffHIGH COST OF NJ GAS UTILITIES' LPP REPLACEMENT PROGRAMS - SYNAPSE06/13/2024
QO24020126- JCP&L 2024 Energy Master Plan Comments - FILED 6.12.24 COMMENTSBPU StaffJCP&L 2024 Energy Master Plan Comments - FILED 6.12.2406/12/2024
QO24020126- JR EMP COMMENTS 6.12.24 FINAL SUBMITTED COMMENTSBPU StaffJR EMP COMMENTS 6.12.24 FINAL SUBMITTED06/13/2024
QO24020126- KF CMT-EMP PROGRAM MGT V1 COMMENTSBPU StaffKF CMT-EMP PROGRAM MGT V106/13/2024
QO24020126- KF-EMP STRAT 5 H2 DER V2 NON-DOCKETED MATTERSBPU StaffKF-EMP STRAT 5 H2 DER V206/13/2024
QO24020126- KJ comments on EMP 2024 COMMENTSBPU StaffKJ comments on EMP 202406/06/2024
QO24020126- Liftoff-OnePager-Offshore-Wind-Web COMMENTSBPU StaffLiftoff-OnePager-Offshore-Wind-Web04/24/2024
QO24020126- Liftoff-Report-Offshore-Wind-Web2 COMMENTSBPU StaffLiftoff-Report-Offshore-Wind-Web204/24/2024
QO24020126- MaGrann-EAM-ReVireo Comments 2024 EMP COMMENTSBPU StaffMaGrann-EAM-ReVireo Comments 2024 EMP06/12/2024
QO24020126- MCCOY-HOWELL COMMENTS FOR THE 2024 EMP FROM A LOCAL COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVE COMMENTSBPU StaffMCCOY-HOWELL COMMENTS FOR THE 2024 EMP FROM A LOCAL COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVE06/12/2024
QO24020126- MSSIA COMMENTS DOCKET QO24020126 - 2024 EMP - LKR 6-12-24 COMMENTSBPU StaffMSSIA COMMENTS DOCKET QO24020126 - 2024 EMP - LKR 6-12-2406/13/2024
QO24020126- Multiple Group EMP Comment Letter 12June24 COMMENTSBPU StaffMultiple Group EMP Comment Letter 12June2406/12/2024
QO24020126- My opinion NJ Energy Master Plan 2024 NJ BPU comment COMMENTSBPU StaffMy opinion NJ Energy Master Plan 2024 NJ BPU comment06/07/2024
QO24020126- NJ 2024 Energy Master Plan Comments- Electrify America COMMENTSBPU StaffNJ 2024 Energy Master Plan Comments- Electrify America06/12/2024
QO24020126- NJ LECET 2024 EMP Comments COMMENTSBPU StaffNJ LECET 2024 EMP Comments06/12/2024
QO24020126- NJACCA EMP Letter COMMENTSBPU StaffNJACCA EMP Letter06/10/2024
QO24020126- NJACCA EMP LETTER BRAC 6-10-2024 COMMENTSBPU StaffNJACCA EMP LETTER BRAC 6-10-202406/10/2024
QO24020126- NJACCA REFERENCE DOCKET NO QO24020126 COMMENTSBPU StaffNJACCA REFERENCE DOCKET NO QO2402012606/10/2024
QO24020126- NJBA COMMENTS ON EMP UPDATE QO2402012 COMMENTSBPU StaffNJBA COMMENTS ON EMP UPDATE QO240201206/13/2024
QO24020126- NJBPU EMP 2024 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD COMMENTSBPU StaffNJBPU EMP 2024 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD06/13/2024
QO24020126- NJDRC COMMENTS - IN THE MATTER OF THE 2024 NEW JERSEY ENERGY MASTER PLAN - BPU DKT. NO. QO24020126 COMMENTSBPU StaffNJDRC COMMENTS - IN THE MATTER OF THE 2024 NEW JERSEY ENERGY MASTER PLAN - BPU DKT. NO. QO2402012606/13/2024
QO24020126- NJEC 2024 NJEMP COMMENTS COMMENTSBPU StaffNJEC 2024 NJEMP COMMENTS06/12/2024
QO24020126- NJENERGY COALITION 2024 NJEMP COMMENTS COMMENTSBPU StaffNJENERGY COALITION 2024 NJEMP COMMENTS06/12/2024
QO24020126- NJGCA EMP Update Comments 06-11-24 COMMENTSBPU StaffNJGCA EMP Update Comments 06-11-2406/11/2024
QO24020126- NJIT comment [2] COMMENTSBPU StaffNJIT comment [2]06/12/2024
QO24020126- NJOWA Final Comments COMMENTSBPU StaffNJOWA Final Comments06/12/2024
QO24020126- NJPGA Comments Electrification June 2024 COMMENTSBPU StaffNJPGA Comments Electrification June 202406/11/2024
QO24020126- NJR EMP Written Comments 6.12 FINAL COMMENTSBPU StaffNJR EMP Written Comments 6.12 FINAL06/12/2024
QO24020126- NJSC OSW BOEM TP COMMENTSBPU StaffNJSC OSW BOEM TP04/24/2024
QO24020126- NJSC OSW BOEM TP COMMENTSBPU StaffNJSC OSW BOEM TP04/25/2024
QO24020126- NJUA EMP Stakeholder Written Comments - Final COMMENTSBPU StaffNJUA EMP Stakeholder Written Comments - Final06/12/2024
QO24020126- NRDC NJ 2024 EMP COMMENTS NON-DOCKETED MATTERSBPU StaffNRDC NJ 2024 EMP COMMENTS06/13/2024
QO24020126- NRG Comments on EMP 061224 final COMMENTSBPU StaffNRG COMMENTS ON EMP 061224 FINAL06/12/2024
QO24020126- Oracle Opower Comments on NJ Energy Master Plan 6.12.24 COMMENTSBPU StaffOracle Opower Comments on NJ Energy Master Plan 6.12.2406/12/2024
QO24020126- OSWFLtr_GovMurphy_etal-combine COMMENTSBPU StaffOSWFLtr_GovMurphy_etal-combine06/12/2024
QO24020126- P3 Comments NJ BPU RFI 2024 EMP 6.12.2024 COMMENTSBPU StaffP3 Comments NJ BPU RFI 2024 EMP 6.12.202406/12/2024
QO24020126- Position Paper - Energy Policy Priorities COMMENTSBPU StaffPosition Paper - Energy Policy Priorities06/12/2024
QO24020126- PSE&G Comments & Responses to RFI - 2024 EMP COMMENTSBPU StaffPSE&G Comments & Responses to RFI - 2024 EMP06/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - CORI BISHOP COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - CORI BISHOP06/03/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN CHERYL DZUBAK COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN CHERYL DZUBAK06/03/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN NANCY M. FRANCY COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN NANCY M. FRANCY06/03/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - ALEJANDRO MESEGUER (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - ALEJANDRO MESEGUER (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - ANN WOLF (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - ANN WOLF (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - BARBARA ANDREW (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - BARBARA ANDREW (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - BARBARA MADDALINA (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - BARBARA MADDALINA (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - BOGDANA SHUMSKA (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - BOGDANA SHUMSKA (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - BRADLEY COX (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - BRADLEY COX (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - BRIAN SCHWARTZ (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - BRIAN SCHWARTZ (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - CAMILLO MUSUMECI (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - CAMILLO MUSUMECI (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - CAREN FITZPATRICK (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - CAREN FITZPATRICK (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - CLAIRE WHITCOMB (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - CLAIRE WHITCOMB (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/01/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - CYNTHIA SABATELLI (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - CYNTHIA SABATELLI (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - DANIEL J. SHIELDS (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - DANIEL J. SHIELDS (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/11/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - DAVID KALDERONE (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - DAVID KALDERONE (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - DAVID WHITE (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - DAVID WHITE (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/13/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - DENIS ZAFIROPOULOS (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - DENIS ZAFIROPOULOS (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/13/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - DENISE LYTLE (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - DENISE LYTLE (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - DIANNA MAGNONI (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - DIANNA MAGNONI (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - DONNA LIPLUMA (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - DONNA LIPLUMA (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - DONNA NINA (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - DONNA NINA (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - EDIE M. SADOWSKI (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - EDIE M. SADOWSKI (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - EDWARD TURNER (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - EDWARD TURNER (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - FAITH MCKIBBIN (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - FAITH MCKIBBIN (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - GEORGE HURST (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - GEORGE HURST (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - HERB CASESAR (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - HERB CASESAR (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/11/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - IBN-UMAR ABBASPARKR (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - IBN-UMAR ABBASPARKR (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - JAMES WALTON (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - JAMES WALTON (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/11/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - JANIE JOHNSON (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - JANIE JOHNSON (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - JAZMENE SMITH (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - JAZMENE SMITH (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - JEAN HEWENS (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - JEAN HEWENS (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - JEANETTE BERGERON (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - JEANETTE BERGERON (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - JESSICA BRADY (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - JESSICA BRADY (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - JOANE GIBBONS (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - JOANE GIBBONS (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - JOANN ECKSTUT (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - JOANN ECKSTUT (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - JOHN DULL (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - JOHN DULL (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/11/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - JORDAN KLOTZ (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - JORDAN KLOTZ (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - JOSEPH PONISCIAK (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - JOSEPH PONISCIAK (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - KATHLEEN MAHER (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - KATHLEEN MAHER (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - KELLY CONNELL (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - KELLY CONNELL (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - KELLY RILEY (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - KELLY RILEY (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - KRISTIN MCCUTCHEON (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - KRISTIN MCCUTCHEON (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - LYNN GLIELMI (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - LYNN GLIELMI (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - LYNN MERLE (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - LYNN MERLE (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - LYNN MIGNOLA (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - LYNN MIGNOLA (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/13/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - MARGE FERRANCE (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - MARGE FERRANCE (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - MARIE CURTIS (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - MARIE CURTIS (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/11/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - MARILYN WECHSELBLATT (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - MARILYN WECHSELBLATT (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/11/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - MARION STEININGER (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - MARION STEININGER (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/11/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - MARJORIE ROYLE (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - MARJORIE ROYLE (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - MICHAEL NELSON (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - MICHAEL NELSON (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - MYRA W. (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - MYRA W. (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - NJ ACCA LETTER SCOTT NELSON COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - NJ ACCA LETTER SCOTT NELSON06/11/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - PAUL ROLLISON (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - PAUL ROLLISON (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - PETER GOTLIEB (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - PETER GOTLIEB (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - RICHARD LIPMAN (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - RICHARD LIPMAN (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - ROBERT VERALLI (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - ROBERT VERALLI (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - ROBIN SHAFFER (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - ROBIN SHAFFER (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - SALLY MIKKELSEN (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - SALLY MIKKELSEN (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - SANDRA GARCIA (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - SANDRA GARCIA (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - SARAH DOUGAN (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - SARAH DOUGAN (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - SHAWN LIDDICK (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - SHAWN LIDDICK (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - SJI COMMENTS RE 2024 EMP FINAL COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - SJI COMMENTS RE 2024 EMP FINAL06/13/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - STACEY FOX (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - STACEY FOX (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - STEPHEN KAHOFER (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - STEPHEN KAHOFER (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - SUSAN MIKAITIS (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - SUSAN MIKAITIS (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - SUSEN SHAPIRO (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - SUSEN SHAPIRO (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/13/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - THOMAS BURTNETT (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - THOMAS BURTNETT (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/13/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - THOMAS CIERECH (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - THOMAS CIERECH (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/06/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - THOMAS GILLEN (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - THOMAS GILLEN (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - TIMOTHY SEVENER (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - TIMOTHY SEVENER (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/01/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - TRACEY FOSTER (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - TRACEY FOSTER (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - VICTORIA MACK (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - VICTORIA MACK (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - WARREN SUCKONIC (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - WARREN SUCKONIC (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - WILLIAM MCKEON (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - WILLIAM MCKEON (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN06/28/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 - ZEAL SHETH (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 - ZEAL SHETH (EVERY ACTION CUSTOM) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE 2024 NJ ENERGY MASTER PLAN07/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ALEJANDRO MESEGUER COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN - ALEJANDRO MESEGUER06/03/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN ANNE BLOOMENTHAL COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN ANNE BLOOMENTHAL06/13/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN BARBARA BUCHANAN COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN BARBARA BUCHANAN06/11/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN BARBARA BURKE COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN BARBARA BURKE06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN BERT MORRIS COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN BERT MORRIS06/17/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN BRIAN M ROSENBERG COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN BRIAN M ROSENBERG06/11/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN CASANDRA UMSTEAD COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN CASANDRA UMSTEAD06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN CATHERINE ADIQUE COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN CATHERINE ADIQUE06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN DAWN ZELINSKI COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN DAWN ZELINSKI06/11/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN DEBORAH KRATZER COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN DEBORAH KRATZER06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN DONNA STERNICK COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN DONNA STERNICK06/17/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN DR. MARYANN SORENSEN ALLACCI COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN DR. MARYANN SORENSEN ALLACCI06/17/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN EDITH NEIMARK COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN EDITH NEIMARK06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN EILEEN ANGLIN COMMENTS COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN EILEEN ANGLIN COMMENTS06/07/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN ELISE MORRISON COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN ELISE MORRISON06/11/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN KATHLEEN HARPER COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN KATHLEEN HARPER06/17/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN KATHY GIACONIA COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN KATHY GIACONIA06/12/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN LARA TRENT COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN LARA TRENT06/17/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN LEONARD BERKOWITZ COMMENTS COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 LEONARD BERKOWITZ COMMENTS06/07/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN LISA FERENCE HAMMOND COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN LISA FERENCE HAMMOND06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN MARIE MCCLELLAND COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN MARIE MCCLELLAND06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN PAULA BUSHKOFF COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN PAULA BUSHKOFF06/11/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN PETER BURVAL COMMENTS COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN PETER BURVAL COMMENTS06/07/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN RITA WRIGHT COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN RITA WRIGHT06/11/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN ROMA BLANCHET COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN ROMA BLANCHET06/13/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN S SOENS COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN S SOENS06/17/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN SUE RANG COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN SUE RANG06/17/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN SUSAN STINSON COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN SUSAN STINSON06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN TARA MCQUAID COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN TARA MCQUAID06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN VICTORIA MARSHALL COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN VICTORIA MARSHALL06/10/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 2024_06_12_ASOW_EMP_C COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024_06_12_ASOW_EMP_C06/13/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 AUSTRALIA REPORT 3.27.23 REPORTSBPU StaffQO24020126 AUSTRALIA REPORT 3.27.2306/13/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 ELEC825 COMMENTS EMP 2024 FINAL COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 ELEC825 COMMENTS EMP 2024 FINAL06/13/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 EMP 2024 STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS - AD ENERGY COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 EMP 2024 STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS - AD ENERGY06/13/2024
QO24020126- QO24020126 ENERGY MASTER PLAN CARLOS ARNOLD COMMENTS COMMENTSBPU StaffQO24020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN CARLOS ARNOLD COMMENTS06/07/2024
QO24020126- Raymond J Albrecht PE New Jersey technical notes annual tons CO2 heating technologies June 10 2024 (002) COMMENTSBPU StaffRaymond J Albrecht PE New Jersey technical notes annual tons CO2 heating technologies June 10 2024 (002)06/11/2024
QO24020126- Reducing the Need to Drive Is a Win for Both Climate Change and Quality of Life (4) COMMENTSBPU StaffReducing the Need to Drive Is a Win for Both Climate Change and Quality of Life (4)06/12/2024
QO24020126- SEIA NJSEC CCSA COMMENTS NJ 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN DOCKET NO. QO24020126 COMMENTSBPU StaffSEIA NJSEC CCSA COMMENTS NJ 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN DOCKET NO. QO2402012606/13/2024
QO24020126- SJI Comments re 2024 EMP Final COMMENTSBPU StaffSJI Comments re 2024 EMP Final06/12/2024
QO24020126- SNJDC NJBPU DOCKET NO. Q024020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTS COMMENTSBPU StaffSNJDC NJBPU DOCKET NO. Q024020126 2024 ENERGY MASTER PLAN COMMENTS06/13/2024
QO24020126- Solar Landscape Comments (06.12.2024) Docket No. QO24020126 FINAL COMMENTSBPU StaffSolar Landscape Comments (06.12.2024) Docket No. QO24020126 FINAL06/12/2024
QO24020126- State Chamber Comments - NJ Energy Master Plan - June 12, 2024 - FINAL COMMENTSBPU StaffState Chamber Comments - NJ Energy Master Plan - June 12, 2024 - FINAL06/12/2024
QO24020126- VE_NJEMP COMMENT LETTER COMMENTSBPU StaffVE_NJEMP COMMENT LETTER06/12/2024
QO24020126- VMT Targets in States Outside NJ.docx COMMENTSBPU StaffVMT Targets in States Outside NJ.docx06/12/2024
QO24020126- Vote Solar Comments - NJ Energy Master Plan 2024 RFI_Docket No. QO24020126 COMMENTSBPU StaffVote Solar Comments - NJ Energy Master Plan 2024 RFI_Docket No. QO24020126 06/12/2024
Showing result(s) 1 - 1 of 1
Showing result(s) 0 - 0 of 0
Showing result(s) 1 - 84 of 84
Posted ByPosted DateCommentsAttachments(s)
FuelCell Energy, Inc.6/12/2024 6:12:02 PMPlease see the attached comments by FuelCell Energy, Inc.FuelCell Energy Comments in Response to 2024 EMP 6.12.2024
Katelyn Lee6/12/2024 5:51:01 PMEVgo Energy Master Plan commentsEVgo_Comments_2024_EMP
Sam Lehr6/12/2024 5:36:48 PMRNG Coalition comments on 2024 Energy Master Plan.240612 Comments on 2024 Energy Master Plan - RNG Coalition
Erika Bosack6/12/2024 5:00:21 PMPlease see attachment.COA 2024 EMP Comments_FINAL
Carolyn Sloan6/12/2024 4:59:43 PMOracle Opower comments on 2024 EMPOracle Opower Comments on NJ Energy Master Plan 6.12.24
Rachel Dawn Davis6/12/2024 4:56:27 PMPlease see attached file. EMP NJBPU Written Comments Waterspirit_June2024
Timothy K. McHugh6/12/2024 4:45:24 PMComments of Jersey Central Power & Light Company on the 2024 update to the New Jersey Energy Master Plan (EMP) Docket Number QO24020126 JCP&L 2024 Energy Master Plan Comments - FILED 6.12.24
Anjuli Ramos-Busot6/12/2024 4:44:33 PMNJ Sierra Club written comments. 6-12-24 SierraClub EMP final
Noreen Giblin6/12/2024 4:43:07 PMPublic Service Enterprise Group, Inc. on behalf of its subsidiaries including Public Service Electric and Gas Company and PSEG Energy Resources and Trade LLC PSE&G’s supplier of natural gas pipeline and storage services, appreciates the opportunity to submit these written comments to the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities as it embarks on drafting the 2024 Energy Master Plan.PSE&G Comments & Responses to RFI - 2024 EMP
Steven Gardner6/12/2024 4:40:26 PMPlease see attached. NJ LECET 2024 EMP Comments
Kim Pelosi6/12/2024 4:36:37 PMPlease see comments attached on behalf of MaGrann Associates, ReVireo and EAM Associates.MaGrann-EAM-ReVireo Comments 2024 EMP
Brooke Helmick6/12/2024 4:31:02 PMPlease see attached PDF. 2024EMP_NJEJA-ICC
Evan Vaughan6/12/2024 4:21:15 PMPlease see attached.ACP MAREC NJ Energy Master Plan Comments June 12 2024
Zeke Weston 6/12/2024 4:18:41 PMPlease find joint comments from New Jersey Future and partners in the comments document attachment. VMT Targets in States Outside NJ.docx
Comments on Energy Master Plan update re_ Transportation
Reducing the Need to Drive Is a Win for Both Climate Change and Quality of Life (4)
Kate Moore6/12/2024 4:14:35 PMAttached are the written comments of the Geothermal Exchange Organization.[2024-06-12] - GeoExchange Comments on Energy Master Plan
Charles Schliep6/12/2024 4:12:22 PMAttached are comments from Solar Landscape, LLC in regard to Docket No. QO24020126., regarding the 2024 Energy Master Plan. Solar Landscape Comments (06.12.2024) Docket No. QO24020126 FINAL
Richmond Young6/12/2024 4:11:31 PMPlease find attached Rise Light & Power's written comments.EMP Rise Comment 6.12.2024_Final
Michael Winka6/12/2024 4:01:17 PMComments attached for the 2024 EMP Update RFI - 6-12-24Comments from MW on BPU's 2024 EMP Update 6-12-24
Kartik Amarnath6/12/2024 3:56:34 PMPlease find comments in the attached document. Thank youVote Solar Comments - NJ Energy Master Plan 2024 RFI_Docket No. QO24020126
Kassandra Damblu6/12/2024 3:53:01 PMPlease see the attached comments.ChargEVC Comments re 2019 NJ EMP (Docket No. QO24020126)_F
Stephanie Forrest6/12/2024 3:26:42 PMPlease see attachment below (SJI Comments re 2024 EMP SJI Comments re 2024 EMP Final
Paulina O'Connor6/12/2024 3:23:13 PMThe New Jersey Offshore Wind Alliance submits their EMP comments. NJOWA Final Comments
Amber Perry6/12/2024 3:15:02 PMPlease find the attached Comments of Atlantic City Electric CompanyACE - Comments to EMP Update - QO24020126 - 6-12-2024
Kevin Roberts 6/12/2024 2:46:28 PMComments from New Jersey Resources concerning BPU DOCKET NO. QO24020126, "In the matter of the 2024 New Jersey Energy Master Plan"NJR EMP Written Comments 6.12 FINAL
Walid Hubbi6/12/2024 2:30:44 PMUnless the technology of renewable energy (RE) improves to such a degree that an RE project is competitive in a level playing field with other electricity generation technologies, zero emission is an illusion. Presently, the need for government incentives (PPA...) and mandates (RPS...) to build RE plants suggests that the current technology is not yet economically competitive. Based on the "energy theory of value", it can be argued that the energy expended in constructing and maintaining a utility-scale RE power plant is more than the energy that will be produced from that plant. Claims to the contrary are misleading because they do not consider the energy needed to build the infrastructure (roads, factories, machines...) and the human capital used to build an RE plant. Consequently, when state governments mandate the adoption of renewable energy, they essentially impose a financial burden on residents to address a global climate change issue.  
Edward O'Donnell6/12/2024 1:59:43 PMThe New Jersey Energy Master Plan (EMP) has set a goal of achieving 100 percent clean energy by 2050. Development of offshore wind energy has been adopted as an important element of de-carbonizing the electric energy sector in support of that goal. Towards that end, the BPU has been directed that 11,000 MW of offshore wind be operational by 2040. The BPU has acknowledged that the guaranteed above market OREC prices awarded to developers of these projects will result in increased costs for all classes of ratepayers in the years ahead and has made estimates of how individual projects will raise rates. However, BPU has not made known the full impact of the complete program which envisions 11,000 MW of offshore wind in operation by 2040. In addition, they have not revealed how much the additional transmission upgrades required to transfer all that power from offshore through the PJM grid to the end use customers will add to rates. Given that the magnitude of the costs involved both with installing offshore wind turbines an transmitting the energy produced is substantial, it is expected that the total impact on rates will be significant. In the absence of any official information on the estimate of the full extent to which the offshore wind program, if realized as projected, will impact NJ rates to all classes of ratepayers. Attached is a report summarizing the findings of that analysis which concludes that these added ratepayer costs will exceed $100 billion and raise electric customer rates by 55%, 70% and 80% respectively for residential, commercial and industrial customers. These rate increases will disproportionately impact lower income residents and small businesses throughout the state and will be an additional burden on top of already high electric power costs. As a result many will find it impossible to remain here and will seek more affordable locations to live. While these projects are expected to provide some economic benefit to the state in the forms of new jobs or investment in manufacturing, as well as emissions reduction, an analysis of the Atlantic Shores project shows that these benefits are far outweighed by the cost to ratepayers and harm to the shore tourism economy and provide little or no net emissions benefit to the state. It is clear that the original assumptions regarding the cost of offshore wind have been proven to be far too optimistic. The recent cancellations of approved projects in New Jersey and elsewhere and calls for renegotiations to increase approved OREC prices provide clear evidence that these costs are not under control or even clearly understood. It is important for all stakeholders to understand what the full cost of this program is before decisions are taken that will be irrevocable and commit the residents of the state to paying for a large portion of these costs or incurring charges for cancelation of projects which prove even more expensive than currently estimated. Accordingly, we call upon you to take the following actions: • Undertake a study of the impact on electric rates of the total cost of the offshore wind program, including OREC and transmission costs. • Pause all new awards or changes to approved prices or costs for offshore wind generation and transmission projects in prior or new solicitations until such time as the total program costs are known and can be clearly shown to be justified by benefits to the state and its ratepayers. Attached is a letter and study which provide support for this request.OSWFLtr_GovMurphy_etal-combine
Savannah Bertrand6/12/2024 1:23:49 PMPlease see Sealed's comments attached, thank you.2406 Sealed New Jersey Energy Master Plan Comments
Anthony Willingham6/12/2024 1:15:45 PMElectrify America's comments in support of adopting alternative rates for DCFC customers and a clean fuel standard to advance strategies 1 and 2 of the Energy Master PlanNJ 2024 Energy Master Plan Comments- Electrify America
Glen Thomas6/12/2024 12:50:41 PMAttached are Comments of The PJM Power Providers Group (P3) regarding the NJ BPU Request for Information for the 2024 NJ EMP update. P3 Comments NJ BPU RFI 2024 EMP 6.12.2024
Joseph Gurrentz6/12/2024 12:48:01 PMDear Secretary Golden, please accept the attached document as the New Jersey Utilities Association's contribution to the 2024 EMP's stakeholder written comments. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this important matter.NJUA EMP Stakeholder Written Comments - Final
Michael Skelly6/12/2024 12:47:11 PMsee attachedComments on BPU Energy Master Plan FINAL
Ken Dolsky6/12/2024 12:37:16 PMEmpowerNJ is submitting two documents to comment on the proposed 2024 EMP update. One is specifically for transportation sector issues and the other covers all other sectors as well as overall comments.EmpowerNJ Comments to NJBPU Regarding Transportation - 2024 Energy Master Plan Update
EmpowerNJ Comments to NJBPU on 2024 EMP Update Final
Philip Pong6/12/2024 12:34:24 PMNJIT would like to provide the attached comments in response to the Request for Information regarding the 2024 update to the State’s Energy Master Plan (“EMP”)(Docket No. QO24020126). Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the 2024 Energy Master Plan. If NJBPU have any questions or want to discuss further, please feel free to contact Prof. Philip Pong at philip.pong@njit.edu.NJIT comment [2]
Dan Kennedy6/12/2024 12:07:41 PMThe attached represents our comments in response to BPU's proposed Energy Master Plan.Position Paper - Energy Policy Priorities
Stacy McCormack 6/12/2024 12:06:20 PMPlease accept these comments. EMP Comments 6.12.24
Affordable Energy for New Jersey6/12/2024 11:59:30 AMPlease Find AENJ Comments submittedELEC Combined Submission 6-12-24
Raymond Cantor6/12/2024 11:47:17 AMDear Ms. Golden: On behalf of the New Jersey Business & Industry Association, the most influential state business association, please accept our comments on the planned update to the 2019 draft Energy Master Plan. NJBIA is in a unique position when it comes to energy policy. As the largest business association in the state, our members include some of the state’s largest employers as well as your Main Street mom and pop businesses. Significantly for these comments, we represent all interests in this policy debate. Our members include most of the energy utilities who supply our residents and businesses with both natural gas and electricity. We also have as members the major businesses engaged in all aspects of renewable energy, from wind developers and transmission providers to solar companies and installers. Many of the businesses driving the “green economy” are our members. Significantly, we also represent the businesses that pay for all that energy, either as major users in the manufacturing sphere or in the normal course of operating a business. We also represent oil and gasoline refineries, the owners of truck fleets that rely on diesel, the retailers who sell their goods, and the installers of both electric and natural gas boilers, among many others. Energy policy, obviously, is extremely important to NJBIA’s members. We look at our role as business advocates, not so much as that of balancing all the various interests, but of seeking the best, most practical solutions to achieve our policy goals, both economic and societal. We are not deniers of climate change, nor are we ideological in our approach. We try to be factual and pragmatic in our policy recommendations. Hopefully those values are reflected in our comments below. There are six foundational principles we believe the EMP must be predicated upon. They will be detailed below, but are: 1) Decarbonization efforts should be practical and human centered; 2) Affordability and reliability must be predicates for all policies; 3) We must emphasize technological advances and consider the role of nuclear power; 4) Sound planning needs to be done before actions are taken; 5) Renewables should continue to be an emphasis of our energy policies; and 6) Energy security in the form of diverse energy options should be a basis for our policy outcomes. There are two hard truths about climate and decarbonization policies. One, energy, primarily through fossil fuels, is essential to our economy and our way of life and, two, substantially eliminating fossil fuels based on current technologies is far too harmful to our modern society. If it were easy, it would have been done by now, or we would be much further along in this effort. It is not, as some would say, “just a matter of will.” There are real and substantial impediments to our decarbonization goals that must be overcome before they are achieved. Also true, is that we do need to significantly decarbonize. The only questions are how, when, and at what cost? So, decarbonization is hard, if not impossible with today’s technology, but yet, it must be done. So, what do we do? I want to emphasize three points: 1. Fossil-based fuels are essential to our modern economy and we cannot just stop using them. It is far more complex than that. We must acknowledge that complexity. 2. Policies that set firm, unrealistic or unachievable deadlines to decarbonize do more harm than good because they result in the implementation of policies that are too costly, result in an unreliable energy supply, and may result in the failure to pursue better technologies and options. 3. Finally, we will provide some specific policy criteria that must be addressed if we are to both protect our standard of living and significantly reduce the amount of carbon we use. Before I discuss those issues, I want to discuss the state of climate science. Last year in its Sixth Annual Assessment Report on Climate Change, the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) narrowed the range of potential impacts from all studied emission scenarios and said that the most extreme emission scenario (RCP 8.5), which I will discuss in a bit more detail, is unlikely to happen given current trends in emissions and energy usage. The narrowing of the impacts means that the worst results that some have predicted are not going to happen no matter the emission scenarios. This is good news; our global emissions policies are working to curb greenhouse gases and the impacts will be less than previously predicted. The most likely emission scenarios are likely to result in a temperature increase in the 2-to-2.5-degree Celsius range, with 1.2 degrees already accounted for over the last century. Again, good news. The impacts of climate change that we are seeing are a mixed bag, but not as bad as some make it seem. Heatwaves (although only a two or three degree increase from expected temperature levels) have been detected, as has heavier precipitation, ecological and agricultural drought, and fire weather. What we are not seeing, beyond the range of expected natural variability, is increases in flooding, meteorological droughts, hydrological drought, tropical cyclones, winter storms, thunderstorms, tornadoes, hail, lightning, or extreme winds. I will note that the IPCC did find increases in peak flows in certain parts of the world, including the northeast of the United States, but they did not attribute that to anthropogenic climate change. Important to New Jersey is that there has been no increase in landed hurricanes and there is no pattern of any increase for the last century. Even Rutgers, in its Report of the 2019 Science and Technical Advisory Panel, found there to be no increase in the frequency of tropical storms, although there were minor increases in intensity and rainfall. Also encouraging is the history of our adaptation to changes in climate over the last century. We have learned that a prosperous society can develop the means to protect itself from natural disasters. Over the last 100 years there has been over a 90% decrease worldwide in deaths due to natural disasters and a 99.7% percent decline since its peak in 1931. At the same time, agricultural production has dramatically increased, and production is expected to continue to increase. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has stated that it does not believe that extreme weather due to climate change will pose any threats to banks over the next 30 years. In fact, the New York Fed stated: “For policymakers, our findings suggest that potential transition risk from climate change warrants more attention than physical disaster risk.” Even under projected climate change scenarios, the IPCC has stated that GDP would not be impacted by more than a few points from projected significant increases in the global economy that will occur despite climate change. We can adapt. New studies have also indicated that sea level rise will not be nearly as serious at the turn of the century as some predicted only a few years ago. The IPCC in AR6 stated that the West Antarctic icesheet is not predicted to collapse, and we will thus not experience 5 feet of sea level rise by the turn of the century. One could easily argue that pandemics, war, disease, and poverty are far greater threats to humanity and should engender an equal, if not greater, public policy response. There has been an over emphasis on climate change being an immediate, existential threat necessitating urgent, and often economically detrimental policy responses. This narrative has been driven by the fact that climate scientists, for various reasons, have focused on only four emission scenarios for the purposes of modeling, which is the primary method used to predict the future impact of climate change. These scenarios do not necessarily represent the most likely outcomes but were chosen for reasons related to modeling needs. The most extreme scenario, representative concentration pathway 8.5 (RCP 8.5), was previously, and misleadingly, labeled as “business as usual” (BAU) even though it was never patterned on likely emissions or trends. The IPCC no longer refers to it as BAU and, as previously mentioned, it is considered unlikely. For instance, for RCP 8.5 to happen, the world would need to abandon all efforts to reduce carbon emissions and build over 30,000 new coal fired plants. Population would have to explode beyond projections, and we would have to burn more coal than supply allows. This is unrealistic. I mention these scenarios only to make the BPU aware, as policymakers, that you must be cognizant of what scenarios are being used when you are told certain impacts will happen. Facts matter, science matters, and we need to set policies based on realistic outcomes. But as I also said, the threats from climate change are real and serious, although not as severe as some initially predicted. And just because catastrophic impacts may not happen this century, we owe a debt to the future to be responsible and not leave future generations a world with challenges that we can help solve today. Thus, decarbonization is not a matter of if, but when and how. But solving the issue of carbon and climate is not easy. Energy, in all its various forms and uses, constitutes the fundamental building block of the modern economy. Having reliable, abundant, and affordable energy to run our factories, heat and cool our homes, and power our transportation sector has transformed our economy from an animal-powered agrarian economy to the most advanced economic system known to man. It has provided us with the power to create millions of jobs, elevate people out of poverty, and provide a standard of living never before accomplished in human history. It generates tax revenues that support the services needed by our residents. We take our energy system for granted; we merely flip a switch, and the lights turn on, we turn the ignition, and our cars power up, and we turn on the furnace and our homes and offices are heated. Since we stopped using whale blubber and trees as our primary sources of energy, our world has relied on cheap, abundant sources of fossil fuels, be it oil or natural gas. Fossil fuels have been the energy source that has powered our economy. I would venture to say that more people have risen from poverty due to the use of fossil fuels than for any other reason. Extreme poverty around the world has also dropped to historic lows. In fact, the big success of the last generation was that the world made rapid progress against the very worst poverty. The number of people in extreme poverty has fallen from nearly 1.9 billion in 1990 to about 650 million in 2018 even as the world’s population grew from around 2 billion at the start of the twentieth century to 8 billion today. This happened as economic growth reached more and more parts of the world, and that economic growth was fueled primarily from fossil fuels. I think it is also obvious to say that by taking people out of poverty, especially extreme poverty, we are saving many, many lives. If our goal is to help lift people from poverty and save lives, if we favor policies that benefit humankind, we need to recognize the role that energy, and fossil fuels, play. We continue to need fossil fuels today and will for many years to come. If the answer was so obvious and the solution was merely to stop their use, then we should stop today. It isn’t and we can’t. This Legislature or Congress has not banned fossil fuel use because the fact of the matter is there in no current realistic alternative available at the scale we need. No large, complex electrical supply system in the world currently relies on the intermittent energy sources of wind and solar for more than 30% of its power. There is a good reason for that. Intermittent power is unreliable and at levels above 25% becomes problematic from a reliability perspective and costly as a power source. New Jersey currently obtains just over 6% of its in-state energy for electric generation from renewables. Solar power provides most of this energy, as wind energy is largely still in development although we expect this industry to ramp up in the very near future. Thus, 94% of the electrical energy produced in New Jersey is from non-renewal sources with over 50% coming from natural gas and over 40% from nuclear. That means to achieve a carbon-free electric generation system we would have to shift natural gas to wind and solar over the next 30 years. Unless we can prolong our nuclear power plants well beyond 2050, and we are encouraged by recent proposals to do so, we would need to convert an additional 35% to 40%. These numbers do not account for the increase in electricity that will occur as a result of economic growth, data centers, and electrification policies. Heating is also dominated by carbon-based sources with over 75% of homes and businesses reliant on natural gas for heat and another 10% using oil. This significant investment in infrastructure cannot simply be turned off in favor of electric boilers and furnaces. There are issues of cost, effectiveness, practicality, and the potential need to double or triple our electricity resources to meet this new demand. Assuming these policies were even physically possible, the cost would be untenable. Using data developed by the Consumer Energy Alliance, the cost of all renewables in New Jersey would be about $115 billion (similar numbers are derived from national data and assumptions developed by Wood Mackenzie when extrapolated to New Jersey). This amounts to $12,900 per person, or $40,000 per state household. This does not account for the cost of heating conversions, not to mention transportation issues. We do recognize that the federal Inflation Reduction Act and the infrastructure bill will provide significant monies to the state for energy transition. Some of this money, appropriately, will support the growth of new technologies. But this money will not cover most costs and may not be available in the future. We should ensure that it is spent wisely, and that consumers’ pocketbooks are protected. Cost, however, may be the least of the problems with achieving a 100% renewable grid or anything remotely close. Evidence has shown that attaining a 25% market penetration for intermittent energy sources can be done relatively easy, “[b]eyond that point, operational and cost complexities progressively multiply in large part due to the intermittent nature of renewables.” (Deep Decarbonization requires deep pockets, Wood MacKenzie, June 2019) The German electricity grid, which relies more heavily on intermittent energy sources than any other major economy, has come close to blackouts and significant blackouts are expected to occur in the next few years. Worse, despite electricity prices that are more than 45% above the European average, Germany has not come close to realizing its carbon reduction goals and has been importing more of its energy. In fact, its energy policies have resulted in increased coal production and the burning of wood pellets as a fuel source. Another consequence of Germany’s energy policies is deindustrialization. Major industries have collapsed and moved elsewhere. This is a horrible result for the German economy and people and moving industry from one country to another does not lessen carbon emissions. The German path of unintended consequences should not be our path. The largest problem for RE100 is the intermittent nature of wind and solar itself. While this issue is generally understood, when applied to a large, complex power system, there is a need to ensure generation and demand alignment on a second-by-second basis. Experience in other systems with over 20% penetration of wind and solar has shown hourly power generations of between zero and 101%. These power variances, in the absence of battery storage (which currently does not exist at sufficient power capacities, is cost prohibitive and technologically impossible to meet demands beyond a few hours) result in overbuilding systems by 100% or more. This creates a hugely underutilized system when power is not being generated or unneeded and creates excess generation when in operation. At higher levels of penetration, challenges associated with intermittent power sources increase nonlinearly. These challenges can be better managed at levels significantly less than RE100. Transmission costs are one of these challenges. Even at RE50, there may be a need to increase long-distance, high-voltage transmission lines from 56% to 105%. Depending on the location of the energy sources, these numbers could increase. (Jenkins et al., “Getting to Zero Carbon Emissions in the Electric Power Sector,” Joule 2018). Siting and NIMBY considerations should not be ignored and may represent significant obstacles to building this infrastructure. The increased costs associated with higher levels of intermittent sources of renewable power will not be offset by the increasingly lower costs of producing energy from these sources. Any decreases in total power generation costs from wind and solar, the levelized cost of energy (LCOE), are significantly outweighed by the enhanced costs associated with incorporating intermittent renewable sources into the energy mix. These costs include not only the cost of building and operating the generation facilities, but also capacity payments, transmission and distribution upgrades, redundant supply, backup power, and other costs. In fact, there appears to be an inverse relationship between a decrease in the LCOE of wind and solar and an increase in cost to the ratepayer. (Wood MacKenzie) It is also very unlikely for current battery technology, based on lithium, to advance enough to solve this problem. Costs will come down and storage capacity will likely increase, but not to the breakthrough extent needed to make reliance on battery technology warranted. (Mills, “The ‘New Energy Economy’: an Exercise in Magical Thinking”) There are pathways to a net-zero approach, as shown by the group at Princeton University who produced the Net-Zero America report and is conducting ongoing research. This report assumes an investment of $2.5 trillion additionally for energy system upgrades over the next decade as well as substantial interstate transmission of renewable resources. It also assumes certain technological and societal changes. In reality, this approach is not practical or desirable. We can certainly have policy debates over how best to obtain a clean-energy or net-zero energy system by 2035 or 2050, but I think that is the wrong question. We now have much better scientific information about timescales and potential harm from climate change as presented by the IPCC in the past summer’s AR6 report. We know that the extreme emission scenarios are improbable, if not impossible, and we know that the impacts from all scenarios are not as great, in this century, then we initially thought when we set our goals and statutory mandates. We should capitalize on this scientific information. Our recommendation for the BPU when it updates its EMP is to pursue an aggressive decarbonization policy, but to do so in a manner that avoids unacceptable impacts and in a timescale that makes sense technologically and that is aligned with the latest science. We should not set artificial deadlines for actions because such deadlines often result in policies that ignore the tenets of affordability and reliability and may have unintended consequences. We see that in Germany today as it is increasing its use of coal, in California where another season of brownouts is expected, and in this country, generally, as the average price of gasoline in states like California is now $5 a gallon. Trying to push policies with artificial deadlines has caused this Administration to pursue an all-electrification policy and to seek to abandon natural gas as an energy source despite cost, impact to the grid, and questionable effectiveness. For instance, converting a modern fuel-efficient natural gas boiler to an electric one would actually increase carbon emissions because of the carbon footprint of the PJM grid. An all-electrification policy has resulted in a mandate to electrify heavy duty trucks before the technology is capable of handling heavy loads and is commercially available at affordable prices, and before the grid and infrastructure has the capacity to handle the loads. An all-electrification policy has caused us to adopt the California Advanced Clean Car II regulation that ignores the will of consumers, the impact on residents, and the practicality of implementation. We need a more holistic, practical response to our decarbonization needs. We must ensure that energy, in all its forms, remains affordable for both residents and businesses. We need to ensure our electrical grid is reliable and not subject to periodic blackouts or brownouts. Affordability and reliability need to be the guardrails of our decarbonization and energy policies. We recommend that New Jersey’s energy policy be founded on six foundational principles: • Decarbonization – Policies should strive to reduce carbon emissions as much and as quickly as practicable based on the best interests of the people living in this state and our economic needs. However, no decarbonization policy should be put in place until a full economic impact assessment, including a ratepayer analysis, is conducted. The economic impact analysis must also study the total costs to residents of these policies. Our policies should emphasize what we can readily achieve now in an affordable and reliable manner and delay other efforts until the technology or other cost-containment measures allow for such adoption. • Affordability and Reliability - Affordability means that low-income or average residents, as well as businesses, can afford to use the energy needed considering the other costs of living and doing business in New Jersey. While climate advocates, and the Energy Master Plan, will often use the term “least cost,” this does not denote affordability as “least cost” is in relation to other considered options. Reliability is essential for the functioning of an energy system and, thus, our economy and quality of life. Both affordability and reliability have been central tenets of New Jersey’s energy policies in the past but have recently been ignored for decarbonization policies. And in looking at cost and benefits, we should not use unsound policies such as the “total cost of carbon” that are based on erroneous assumptions and are crafted with an end result in mind. • Emphasis on Technology - Technological advances should be pursued as a key component of the state Energy Master Plan. While intermittent sources of energy need to be part of our energy future, renewables alone cannot replace carbon sources of fuel and still meet the goals of affordability and reliability. We will need new technologies, some of which may not even be known yet, in order to meet net-zero emissions goals. Technologies such as hydrogen, next generation or modular nuclear, renewable natural gas (RNG), wave energy, fusion, geothermal, microgrids, smart metering, energy efficiency, carbon capture, low carbon fuel standards, and others should be fully vetted and discussed in the Energy Master Plan. Everything should be on the table. I want to specifically reference next generation nuclear, be it modular or from some other advanced technology. The Energy Master Plan assumes our nuclear fleet will be operational through 2050, but it makes no provision or assumptions beyond that. This is unacceptable from a planning perspective. Much of the rest of the world is rediscovering carbon-free, nuclear energy. We need to engage in a serious policy discussion about its efficacy. • Sound Planning - No major changes in energy sources should be mandated until affordable and reliable alternatives are readily available to replace those sources, and the infrastructure is in place or planned to be in place when those sources are activated. The promotion of current electrification policy initiatives has not considered the needs of increased electrical generation and the transmission systems necessary to support them. We have been putting the cart before the horse. In fact, there are currently hundreds of solar projects that are ready to be built but which have been put on hold due to the lack of distribution lines to connect to the grid. The infrastructure challenge is also an issue for transportation electrification problems and will only be exacerbated by the need for data centers, economic growth, and other electrification policies. PJM has already sounded the alarm that we are retiring fossil fuel power sources faster than replacement power is being brought online. If this trend continues, grid reliability could be at stake. • Emphasis on Clean Energy Sources - We should continue to pursue established clean energy options, including wind, solar, and nuclear power. New Jersey already has substantial sources of clean energy, and more is rapidly coming on board. Our three remaining nuclear power plants provide roughly 40% of electric generation in the state. Our solar industry supplies another 6% and is growing. Our offshore wind industry has already been approved for 5200 MW with a total goal of 11,000 MW. Numerous proposals have already been submitted for the transmission projects to build out the offshore wind generation. Together, the continuation and expansion of these sources of power represent a substantial sum of our total electricity energy needs, although we recognize that those needs may significantly grow in the future depending on state and federal electrification policies. These industries should be supported, eliminating unnecessary regulatory burdens and establishing the process for their development in a cost and time effective manner. We need to solve our transmission and congestion problems if these industries are to reach their full potential. • Energy Security - Multiple energy options should be available to ensure security and the continuous availability of energy in varied forms, in sufficient quantities, and at affordable prices. It has been a tenet of energy policy, until recently, that an energy system provides for a range of energy options and sources so that consumers are protected from sharp price increases and disruption should one energy market be disrupted. We are seeing this play out in real time in Europe, which stopped fracking for natural gas and began to close nuclear power plants only to become dependent on natural gas from Russia. New Jersey’s energy consumption policies should embrace an “all of the above” approach to protect against market disruptions. In addition, beyond efforts to mitigate climate change by reducing carbon emissions, we recognize that extreme weather events have and always will be part of living in a coastal state. We also recognize, as we have stated above, that sea levels are rising, rainfall is getting more intense, and heatwaves are increasing. Therefore, we should emphasize resiliency efforts. We favor the use of sound science to predict future climate impacts and the protection of our citizens and infrastructure rather than a general policy of retreat which has not been given a sound public airing. Our policy recommendations are not rooted in artificial deadlines for actions. Rather, they are based on what is in the best overall interest of the citizens of New Jersey. We fully agree on the need to deeply decarbonize our economy and to achieve a net-zero, or lower, carbon policy but we believe science shows we do not have to rush to take actions that may preclude the use of more effective technologies. Many of the comments we made in the planning and drafting of the 2019 EMP are applicable today. We now have the benefit of evaluating how many of the policies put into place have worked and the lessons learned. We also have the benefit of updated science, evolving technologies, and the experiences of other states and nations who have led decarbonization efforts. NJBIA remains supportive of the goals of the EMP to meet the 80% carbon reduction mandates of the Global Warming Response Act. We are generally supportive of Governor Murphy’s goal of 100% clean energy by 2050, defined as 100% carbon neutral or net zero carbon emissions from the electric generation sector. However, we note that neither Executive Order 315 (Murphy) nor the Global Warming Response Act are legally binding and enforceable mandates to take any particular action. They are primarily aspirational and setting decarbonization goals for the state. It is good to have aspirations so long as we do not try to achieve them to our detriment. We believe there are two paths that can be taken in the updated EMP and ultimately in its implementation. One is prohibitively costly, will put our energy supplies at risk, and is not reasonably achievable. The other is based on considerations of cost, availability of resources, and realism. This pragmatic approach does not overemphasize intermittent sources of renewable energy, such as wind and solar. It allows for low carbon sources of power. It recognizes the continued need for natural gas and other forms of fossil fuels. And it is flexible and adaptable. We want to ensure that the updated EMP learns the lessons of the last five years and adjusts accordingly. We do want to acknowledge the policy decisions implemented in the last five years that have been successful and put on the right path. The goal of developing 11,000 megawatts of offshore wind power, while aggressive, has proven to be a motivation for action. New Jersey’s new wind port and manufacturing capacity development will allow us to be a regional, if not national, leader in job creation in the wind industry. While there have been challenges in standing up a new industry in a period of changing economic conditions, we appear to be on the right track with sound companies securing awards to develop wind farms off our coast. Together with innovative policies for transmission facilities, New Jersey is well positioned to lead the nation in energy production from offshore wind. Our solar industry also is on the right track having transitioned from its initial phases to a program that recognizes both the need for certainty and economic opportunity while putting in place constraints that will protect ratepayers. Policies that advance utility scale solar as well as incentives for brownfield and warehouse development will continue to drive expansion of this resource. We believe the EMP should consider the successful pursuit of a clean energy economy to mean one that achieves deep decarbonization of our energy sector in a manner that results in affordable, reliable, and abundant energy supplies. Our goals must be reasonably achievable. They need to be implemented with the support of the public and business sector, not implemented despite their objections. If the updated EMP does not contain policies which are supported by the public and business community, it will fail, and so will the efforts to address our carbon reduction efforts in a meaningful way. 100% Clean Energy: There are many ways to meet the 100% clean energy goals sought by the EMP, as well as the carbon reduction goals of Global Warming Response Act. Some have argued for a rigid policy involving a moratorium on natural gas facilities and hookups, a ban on all carbon fuels, and an electrical grid based solely on wind and solar resources. That strategy would fail because it is neither affordable nor feasible. It should be rejected. A more realistic approach would be to allow firm generation from both nuclear and natural gas resources. It should be flexible to allow for consideration of various technologies, some currently available, some not, such as carbon capture, low carbon fuels, next generation nuclear, mitigation, offsets, energy efficiency, and new technologies or strategies perhaps not yet foreseen. A Strategy with the Greatest Chance of Success: For all the reasons described above, the EMP should reject a requirement for all electricity to be produced from intermittent renewable energy sources. Rather, NJBIA believes that our carbon reduction goals can more likely be met, at affordable prices and in a reliable and feasible manner, if we limit intermittent renewable energy sources to a more manageable number, perhaps RE50, and provide the rest of the electric generation through firm sources such as nuclear power and natural gas. The best strategy is one that keeps all options on the table and is flexible enough to move in the right direction as technologies evolve or do not and as new facts and considerations are made known. We need to allow for low carbon alternatives to reduce our carbon output, as well as techniques such as carbon capture, mitigation, offsets, next generation nuclear, energy efficiency, and evolving and yet unknown technologies. We must not make policy decisions today, such as gas infrastructure or hookup bans, that lock us into a defined path. The best path goes in multiple directions. Rigid thinking will surely lead to poor decisions and ill-fated outcomes. Allowing for more options to solve our energy generation issues will result in a statistically greater chance of being successful in achieving our goals. We should have both short-term, implementable action items and longer-term aspirational goals. As the EMP is updated every three years, changes to strategies should be made based on current circumstances. Building Electrification: Twenty-nine percent of our greenhouse gases come from the building sector with approximately 14% from residential buildings, 10% from commercial, and 4% from industrial. While this sector needs to be addressed to meet our carbon reduction goals, the requirement that all buildings be electrified by 2050 ignores feasibility, cost, and public support. This is especially true to the extent the EMP is seeking retrofits of existing buildings to require the installation of electric heat pumps. Over 75% of our buildings are heated by natural gas, with another 10% heated with oil or propane. Converting this building stock to electric heat pumps, as proposed by the EMP, would be a herculean effort and may not even be possible from a workforce and equipment perspective, even in a 30-year horizon. It also ignores other options for heating buildings that maintain the billions of dollars of existing infrastructure. Development of renewable natural gas, hydrogen and other low carbon, or net carbon options are more practical, cost effective, and likely to be accepted by the public and business community. The bottom line is that a building electrical mandate is costly, impractical, and likely to fail while a flexible approach may achieve early emission reductions and offers long-term net reductions. There are also other options that should be explored such as geothermal and geo-exchange that is being successfully implemented at Princeton University. In the industrial sector, carbon capture may be an option for certain facilities as that technology advances. As with all energy policies, a top down, proscriptive approach should be rejected in favor of allowing technological development, experimentation, flexibility and options. The EMP should provide technical assistance and education to advance pragmatic decarbonization strategies. Aside from these practical issues, electrification of the building sector will significantly increase the amount of electricity needed. Some estimates are that generation may need to increase by 100% or more. And unlike electrification of the transportation sector, discussed below, electrification of buildings cannot be ameliorated by load balancing. Because of the need to heat buildings throughout the day, New Jersey will become a winter peaking state. This will cause generation and transmission issues which will also increase costs to consumers. The bottom line on building electrification is to allow flexibility and not to lock citizens or businesses into a particular technology or fuel choice. Technology will evolve, efficiency efforts can be enhanced, and consumers can be better educated. By some estimates, we can achieve 80% reduction in carbon emissions by focusing on emissions, not fuel choices. This applies to the building sector as well. Transportation: Forty-two percent of the greenhouse gas emissions in New Jersey are attributable to the transportation sector. This includes cars and light duty trucks, as well as mid- and heavy-duty vehicles, off-road vehicles and the ports. NJBIA is largely supportive of decarbonizing the transportation sector. Because the EMP had identified electrification of transportation as the sole policy for decarbonization, and because the emphasis on meeting artificial deadlines was driving policy, the Department of Environmental Protection adopted two far reaching regulations – the Advanced Clean Truck rule and the Advanced Clean Car II rule. Both rules mandate the adoption of zero emission vehicles (under current standards, this means EVs or limited battery powered hybrid vehicles). Both rules are costly. Both rules are impractical. Both rules should be replaced. The ACT rule mandates that all heavy-duty trucks be zero emission by 2035. This mandate was adopted despite the fact that these vehicles are often cost prohibitive, need extensive and expensive charging systems, will need their own power supply, and, in the case of heavier duty trucks, do not currently exist. These trucks often do not meet the needs of businesses due to charging times and distances traveled. The Department should repeal this rule and allow the market and technology to develop. Similarly, ACC II would mandate the sale of electric vehicles at rates beyond the capacity of the market to handle. When the rule takes effect in 2027, 43% of new car sales must be EVs. We are currently at 11% and there is no indication that sales will accelerate. In fact, EVs are piling up on dealer lots. Early adopters have largely bought EVs and others are rejecting them. Consumers are concerned about cost and practicality. They are concerned about range and the ability to charge their vehicle. There will be a wide range of people who will not be able to afford these vehicles, even with subsidies, making those in economic distress even more disadvantaged. The Department should repeal this mandate and allow the market to develop organically. We also do not support large subsidies of vehicle charging infrastructure that are paid for by electricity ratepayers. We do not support use of the Societal Benefit Charge to subsidize the purchase of vehicles. We do, however, support current efforts by the BPU and the Department of Environmental Protection to determine the need for a public subsidy of additional vehicle charging stations, the types of charging that is necessary, and reasonable methods to pay for it. But subsidies, for both charging stations and vehicles, cannot be a long-term answer. The market must be allowed to drive down costs for both. The public cannot be expected to continually subsidize these markets, especially vehicles, given their tremendous cost. In fact, given the current market penetration of electric vehicles, it can be argued that the technology has not been proven and it no longer needs to be subsidized. Subsidies for charging stations should only be allowed where there is a need that cannot be supplied by the market. While electric vehicles may very well be the wave of the future, they are not the only alternative to gasoline and diesel-powered internal combustion engines (ICE). The EMP should be supportive of that and not cut off other fuels such as hydrogen in fuel cell vehicles or low carbon fuels, such as compressed natural gas or renewable gas or diesel, especially in mid- or heavy-duty trucks and equipment. Distributed Energy and Transmission Upgrades: The provisions in the draft EMP on distributed energy and transmission raise more questions than answers. They foresee a transformation of the energy sector but do not explain how that will happen, how the system would operate, who would pay, how much it will cost, and how it would work in a regional electric grid system. While it is useful to envision a radically different energy future, significantly more research, technological change, and stakeholdering needs to be done before we can even decide if some of these changes are even a good idea. Conclusion: NJBIA is appreciative of the visionary aspects of the draft EMP, but we are concerned about the reality of ensuring affordable, abundant, and reliable energy. We are concerned that our economy continues to function, that businesses and their jobs remain in the State, and that residents can afford their electric bills. We recommend that the Administration use this EMP update process to implement short-term policies that are achievable and cost-effective now, and revisit more aspirational policies at the next EMP update as more information is gathered, conversations had, and facts become known. As we seek a clean energy economy, and a reduction in carbon output, we must ensure that all our energy supplies for all our needs remain affordable, abundant, and reliable. Raymond Cantor Deputy Chief Government Affairs Officer New Jersey Business & Industry Association Comments on EMP '24
Deborah Mans6/12/2024 9:28:47 AMPlease accept the attached comments on behalf of representatives from environmental and social justice, business health, labor, and environmental and clean energy groups.Multiple Group EMP Comment Letter 12June24
Matt Lydon6/12/2024 8:55:33 AMPlease find attached our comments to the Request for Information regarding the matter of the 2024 New Jersey Energy Master Plan.2024-06-12 TGC NJBPU EMP RFI Comments
Michael Egenton6/12/2024 8:47:20 AMJune 12, 2024 Via Email (board.secretary@bpu.nj.gov) Sherri L. Golden, Board Secretary New Jersey Board of Public Utilities 44 South Clinton Avenue, 1st Floor P.O. Box 350 Trenton, NJ 08625-0350 Re: Dkt. No. QO24020126 I/M/O The New Jersey Energy Master Plan Response to Request for Information Dear Secretary Golden: The New Jersey State Chamber of Commerce (“State Chamber”) is pleased to submit these comments and information in response to the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (“NJBPU”) Request for Information (“RFI”) regarding the Board’s inquiry on the 2024 update to the New Jersey Energy Master Plan (“EMP”). Since 1911, the New Jersey State Chamber of Commerce (“State Chamber”) has been recognized as the most respected, prestigious, bi-partisan and well-connected business association in New Jersey. With a broad-based membership ranging from the Fortune 500 companies to small proprietorships, representing every corner of the state and every industry, our members provide jobs for over a million people in New Jersey. We continue to work toward streamlining the regulatory process while striving to maintain the economic vitality of our members and the quality of life that makes New Jersey unique. Energy is the lifeblood of the economy. Reliable, safe, reasonably-priced and environmentally sound energy supply is essential for New Jersey’s economic progress and future. The State Chamber supports a balanced approach toward achieving the EMP goals that doesn’t depend or rely on one method, one technology, one fuel source, or overburden one segment of the economy or group of energy consumers. The reliability and resilience of our energy, along with our transportation systems, are key to our businesses and their operations in the State. We support continued efforts in strengthening, modernizing and updating our aging power grid. We recognize the need for such investments and like any other long-term solution, the management and financing of such investments require thoughtful but structured, more predictable deliberation. The New Jersey business community – both our industrial and commercial members – have worked diligently over the past several decades to make the necessary investments in both state-of-the-art air pollution control equipment and technology and energy efficiency. Control technologies such as selective catalytic reduction, scrubbers, carbon injection and baghouses have been installed on power plants and other industries resulting in a reduction in energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. The State Chamber will take the opportunity to highlight some of the specific energy sectors our organization believes must be “on the table” as the State of New Jersey prepares for the energy needs of the business community and residents in the outlying years: GRID INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS The State Chamber recognizes that electric transmission resources are essential to maintain the reliability, efficiency, and safety of the electric system. Transmission additions and upgrades are also elements of a balanced approach to meeting the needs of energy consumers. The ability to move power throughout the State and the region and to resolve congestion on the system that affects reliability and increases costs remains an important goal. New transmission construction also is an economic driver in its own right that will create jobs directly and through associated economic activity. Concerns about the current infrastructure grid have become front-and-center as a result of the push to electrify transportation and the building heating. The NJBPU knows all to well that as the use of electric cars have expanded, the need to have electricity transmitted and distributed to a wider range of locations in the state has increased substantially. Convenience store chains have expanded the construction of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations, in some cases having over a dozen charging stations in one location. While the expansion of EVs is a good thing for our environment, it has been apparent that the local grids have become severely stressed to capacity requiring upgrades. The expansion of solar generation in New Jersey, particularly grid-supply solar projects, and the Governor’s agenda to expand more community solar projects, has caused interconnection delays in certain areas of the state. While there appear to be several causes to this problem, the lack of capacity along the transmission grid is one of these causes. In order to maintain grid reliability and increase grid capacity, New Jersey’s utilities, especially their electric distribution companies (EDCs), should continue making substantial investments in modernizing their grids to support this increased deployment and ensure the continued safe and reliable operation of their systems. The State Chamber encourages the BPU to work closely with the State’s utilities and other stakeholders to fully utilize the accelerated recovery mechanism for infrastructure investments that are in place, and identify alternative regulatory mechanisms, to incentivize the substantial investment in the utilities’ systems that will be necessary to meet the State’s clean energy goals. Additionally, we recognize the importance of modernizing the overall utility infrastructure, including upgrading and replacing leaking gas pipelines. NATURAL GAS In this time of transition to a reduced carbon footprint, New Jersey must continue to cultivate a natural-gas friendly environment. Natural gas is economically efficient and is a clean, safe, and reliable source of energy. Our natural gas infrastructure is vital for a strong economy and the reliability of the state’s power grid. Our utilities have made significant investments in improving old pipes to reduce the fugitive emission of natural gas, and are anxious to invest capital to enhance the infrastructure and reliability. That needs to be supported as a vital step towards achieving the goals of the EMP. When it comes to affordability, natural gas is a proven reliable fuel source that can actually lower costs for families and businesses -- it is a proven cost-effective resource that provides fuel diversity. Recognizing the availability of low-cost natural gas and the primacy of gas use in home heating, it would be imprudent to neglect the state’s gas delivery infrastructure. Additionally, natural gas is improving air quality in our state. Natural gas produces nearly a third less carbon dioxide than coal and almost half less than oil when burned. Natural gas also emits little to no sulfur and runs more efficiently than other fuels. In that regard, perhaps one of the biggest investments that both the private sector and our natural gas utilities have undertaken is the development of renewable natural gas (RNG). We have seen the recent development of two primary sources of RNG: food waste, and landfill gas. Regarding food waste, in 2020, Governor Murphy signed A-2371 requiring large food generators to source separate and recycle food waste. There has been significant development of RNG facilities that utilize food waste to manufacture clean, pipeline grade RNG. While we still await regulations implementing this law, we have seen facilities developed to develop food waste-to-RNG production. Similarly, the methane gases that result from decomposing waste in landfills has now become a source of pipeline grade RNG; there have been several projects that have been developed or are in the preliminary stages of development. In each case, the RNG reduces New Jersey’s carbon footprint and provides much needed natural gas. The State Chamber supports a green economy and reducing emissions. We believe the natural gas system can do that through continued investment in infrastructure, as well as investing in RNG and hydrogen. These alternative, low-to-zero carbon fuels will reduce emissions and will create jobs and an energy production industry in the state that doesn’t currently exist. The EMP should encourage the development of clean fuels in New Jersey. The State Chamber supports the State’s desire to achieve a clean energy future but cautions against policies that stand to harm the New Jersey economy without tangible environmental benefits. In particular, the State Chamber recommends that the State avoid pursuing widespread electrification to the exclusion of natural gas service. Nearly 75% of New Jerseyans rely on natural gas, and it represents a source of safe, affordable, and reliable energy for our businesses. Ratepayers, including businesses, have invested billions in the gas system over many decades, and this infrastructure can help to decarbonize buildings, and our economy by carrying clean fuels like renewable natural gas and hydrogen. Furthermore, unlike traditional natural gas, these clean fuels can (and already are) being produced here within the State, creating jobs and contributing to State’s economy. Calls to abandon this reliable energy source in favor of electric should be rejected. At present, our electric grid remains heavily reliant on carbon-emitting power generation, and requires significant transmission and distribution upgrades to better accommodate existing demand, not to mention the expected growth in electric demand owing to EV deployment and data center development. As power plants in New Jersey have shut down, the fact of the matter is that the State has now become more dependent on out-of-state generation, notably generation in Pennsylvania. The fact that Pennsylvania has rejected participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) means that Pennsylvania power plants have a distinct price advantage over New Jersey power plants. As the Board is well aware, these power plants to the west still utilize coal as well as less controlled technologies. In contrast, while New Jersey’s fleet is cleaner, it has to compete with these out-of-state and dirtier power sources. Continued development of natural gas in New Jersey, particular in the areas of RNG and hydrogen, allow us to continue the safe and reliable provision of heat until the region, and indeed the United States, ultimately is able to convert to cleaner fuels. Working together, the electric and gas systems can continue to supply our State’s businesses with the energy they need, while they continue to improve in a way that reduces emissions. NUCLEAR Nuclear energy has been a powering source for the United States for over 60 years. Nuclear energy protects air quality by producing massive amounts of emission free, and in particular carbon-free electricity. Nuclear energy continues to generate energy when the wind isn’t blowing and the sun isn’t shining. New Jersey needs to support and continue to invest in our operating nuclear generating stations in Salem County (Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations). SMALL MODULAR REACTORS (SMR) The emerging SMR market has gained momentum in recent years. SMRs are nuclear reactors that are “small” (300 megawatts of electrical power or less), can be largely assembled in a centralized facility, and would be installed in a modular fashion at power generation sites. Their lower initial capital investment, enhanced efficiency, reduced carbon emissions, versatility and scalability make them a valuable addition to the energy mix. Small nuclear reactors should be considered as a potential component in our pursuit of a renewable energy future. WIND The State Chamber recognizes that New Jersey has great offshore wind potential. We support offshore wind in New Jersey and the building of a new, clean energy industry that will spur significant economic growth in the Garden State. We need to increase renewable energy sources to meet our growing energy demands, and offshore wind is the most significant opportunity to do this on the East Coast while creating thousands of jobs and billions of dollars of economic activity. Transmission investment will also be crucial as the next step in delivering offshore wind energy to New Jersey demand centers and ensuring a reliable electric grid in New Jersey. We support the BPU in their current use of PJM’s State Agreement Approach for transmission development. As the longest serving member of the New Jersey Clean Air Council at the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, our association recognizes the environmental benefits of offshore wind energy in improving air quality and creating a clean energy future for our residents and businesses. SOLAR New Jersey is a leader in the solar industry, ranking eighth for total installed solar capacity nationwide. The State Chamber supports solar incentives like tax exemptions, net metering and the federal solar tax credit. Additionally, the State Chamber supports solar development at sites such as landfills, brownfields, warehouses, and government facilities that provide potential for larger installations, improve economies of scale, and that would return unproductive or underutilized sites to societal use. However, as outlined above, the continued success of New Jersey’s solar industry is predicated upon electric grid infrastructure that can support the expanded development of solar energy. ENERGY EFFICIENCY The State Chamber recognizes the importance of energy efficiency to achieving business and environmental goals. For businesses, using energy more efficiently saves money, reduces operating costs, increases competitiveness, and promotes job retention and creation. The State Chamber would welcome development of additional efficiency programs aimed at commercial and industrial customers. We also encourage State and local governments to lead by example and pursue efforts to reduce energy demand in government buildings. The EMP should remain aligned with the 2021 Clean Energy Act provisions around energy efficiency and continue to prioritize energy efficiency measures for both gas and electric customers and equipment in order to meet emission reduction targets. New Jersey should remain open to new end-use technologies, and support innovative utility energy-efficiency programs on both the gas and electric system, especially hybrid heat, networked geothermal, and demand response. New Jersey's utilities have realistic, achievable strategies to bring cost-effective emissions reductions to our state, including through energy efficiency, low- and zero-carbon fuels, hybrid heat, and the significant potential for carbon capture and other breakthroughs. New Jersey must continue to explore renewable natural gas, green hydrogen, hybrid heat, geothermal heat and wastewater-to-hydrogen projects. HYDROGEN and FUEL CELL TECHNOLOGY As New Jersey companies continue to focus on their decarbonization efforts and make progress toward achieving their emissions reduction commitments, the State should be open to incentivizing industry to transition parts of their operations to incorporate hydrogen and fuel cell technologies. The State Chamber encourages the State to continue their work with and support the research of New Jersey’s academic institutions to pursue making hydrogen and fuel cell technology another viable option to our energy demands. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made significant strides in recent years, revolutionizing human-machine interactions and enabling complex tasks. However, as AI’s capabilities expand, so does its energy consumption. Demand for electricity is going to soar in the coming years, notably from data centers. If New Jersey is going to be a leader in AI, it will need data centers -- which require vast amounts of new sources of electricity. The future of AI hinges on finding sustainable solutions for its energy needs and the State will need to take a proactive approach by supporting more power generation amid growing demand. FISCAL IMPACT With all of these proposals, the State Chamber strongly encourages the NJBPU to analyze and review the cost to implement these projects and the impact – pro or con – to the State’s economy. The NJBPU needs to continue their due diligence process to safeguard the interests of ratepayers, making sure that we avoid any undue economic burdens. The State Chamber appreciates the opportunity to provide input and respectfully requests that our views be given proper consideration. Sincerely, Michael A. Egenton Executive Vice President Government Relations State Chamber Comments - NJ Energy Master Plan - June 12, 2024 - FINAL
Suzanne Moore6/11/2024 10:05:56 PMsee attachedComments Energy Master Plan Defend Brigantine Beach Inc and Downbeach 6.11.24
Madeleine Lee6/11/2024 7:42:45 PMI support solar energy and request that it be a main component of the upcoming Master Energy Plan. Thank you. 
Karla Sosa6/11/2024 6:15:20 PMEnvironmental Defense Fund thanks the Board of Public Utilities for the opportunity to comment on the 2024 EMP. Please find our written comments attached. EDF_NJ_2024 EMP Comments
John Richkus6/11/2024 5:04:16 PMI express my support for solar energy, and request that it be a major part of the upcoming Master Energy Plan. I also request that the Master Energy Plan stop relying on polluting fossil fuels that harm our health and communities. Thank you. 
Eric Blomgren6/11/2024 4:41:01 PMPlease review attached documentNJGCA EMP Update Comments 06-11-24
John Kolesnik 6/11/2024 3:47:36 PMEnergy Efficiency Alliance of New Jersey Comments for the Energy Master Plan 2024EEA-NJ Energy Master Plan 2024 Public Stakeholder Comments
Jacqueline Piazza6/11/2024 2:55:19 PMThe NJPGA appreciates the opportunity to comment. Thank you. ~Jacqueline PiazzaNJPGA Comments Electrification June 2024
Eric DeGesero6/11/2024 2:41:53 PMAttached are the comments of the Fuel Merchants Assn of NJ prepared by Ray Albrecht, PE. These comments provide for a more cost effective and less intrusive manner to decarbonize buildings than only allowing for electric heat pumps. Raymond J Albrecht PE New Jersey technical notes annual tons CO2 heating technologies June 10 2024 (002)
Matthew Gregorovic6/11/2024 9:57:50 AMSubmittal for request for new programs. BPU Submittal request
David Family Member komes6/11/2024 9:27:58 AMOur energy can and should consist of renewables only without fossil fuels! Climate change is real,we need to act now. 
Bruce Revesz6/11/2024 9:16:47 AMOur energy can and should consist of renewables only without fossil fuels! 
Stan Orzechowski6/10/2024 7:38:28 PMJune 12, 2024 Sherri L. Golden, RMC Secretary of the Board 44 South Clinton Ave., 1st Floor PO Box 350 Trenton, NJ 08625-0350 Phone: 609-292-1599 Email: board.secretary@bpu.nj.gov Reference: Docket No. QO24020126 Dear Secretary Golden: Our organization reviewed the Request for Information regarding the next iteration of the state’s Energy Master Plan and respectfully submit our comments and concerns. Our member community represents over 10,000 licensed contractors who understand the heating, ventilating, air conditioning and refrigeration needs of New Jersey residents. Our members are trusted to design, install, service, and repair HVAC equipment and systems of all sizes and complexities. We believe the experience and knowledge of our members has immeasurable value and will be critical to achieving the states decarbonization and clean energy goals in cost-effective manner. Please consider the following technical and logistical comments. If accepted, we believe would support a successful implementation of the next Energy Master Plan. • Mandated electrification is not a one-size-fits-all solution that will achieve New Jersey’s decarbonization goals, as each home and customer have different energy needs and configurations. Full electric conversions have complex requirements, often quite costly and time consuming. Further, a large percentage of system replacements are performed on an emergency basis, with little time to perform required upgrades, further impacting customers’ heating or cooling abilities. • Utility energy efficiency incentive programs are more important than ever to ensuring the customer seriously considers installing the high efficiency options that our members present to customers. Over the past few years, we have seen substantial increases in HVAC equipment costs and we expect more price increases from manufacturers in the coming years. We are often competing against other contractors who are proposing baseline efficiency equipment which is significantly cheaper and easier to install. We know this isn’t the right decision in the long run for that customer or for society. To have a fighting chance to counter that low-ball, baseline efficiency equipment proposal from other contractors, you must continue to have the utilities offer strong incentives and no-cost financing. • We are your front lines for decarbonization and are ready to promote the installation of electric heat pumps when it should save the customer money and the customer wants to install that equipment. However, many customers still want natural gas equipment and incentives must be preserved. Without strong incentives and 0% financing (preferably on-bill repayment) for high-efficiency natural gas equipment, it is more likely the customer will choose lower efficiency gas equipment. That won’t help the state reach their goals. • We strongly encourage the state to offer stronger incentives for hybrid heating solutions. Hybrid solutions allow customers to take advantage of heat pumps cost-effectively, as smaller heat pumps paired with existing gas heating systems do not require expensive upgrades to electric panels, ductwork, and added dehumidification equipment. Hybrid solutions also allow customers take advantage of the benefits of heat pumps at reasonable costs. o It is important to size heat pumps and other equipment in the home according to ACCA Manual D, J, & S protocols, ANSI Standards, and International Mechanical Code as required by New Jersey Building Code. o Heating capacity needs in New Jersey are significantly higher than air conditioning requirements. The existing electric panels and ductwork are typically sized to the cooling load and would require expensive upgrades for full heating load sized heat pumps. These upgrades can easily reach costs over $10,000 per home. Homes without air conditioning may not have the requisite space for condensing units. o Covering the entire heat load with an electric heat pump is typically more expensive for customers to operate in heating season as compared to a high-efficiency natural gas furnace. We thank you for taking the time to consider our comments. Sincerely, Stan Orzechowski, Vice President Bens ProServ President NJACCA NJACCA EMP Letter
Amy Goldsmith6/10/2024 5:41:41 PMFrom: Amy Goldsmith, NJ State Director, Clean Water Action To: Board of Public Utilities Secretary, Sherri L. Golden Re: Docket No. QO24020126 Energy Master Plan-2024 Update DATE: June 10, 2024 Together with Clean Water Action’s membership and over 75,000 email alert subscribers, we represent New Jersey residents seeking a squeaky clean energy path going forward that provides power to meet future needs, meets our ambitious climate goals, as well as protects our physical health and economic well-being as if our life depends on it as it does. Ultimately our comments reflect the following goals: 1. Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions from the Transportation Sector; 2. Accelerating Deployment of Renewable Energy and Distributed Energy Resources; 3. Decarbonizing (phase out fossil fuels and nuclear) Energy Sector; 4. Modernizing New Jersey’s Energy System, and 5. Ensuring that communities (predominately Black, Brown, low income and with limited English proficiency) with a long history of being overburdened by multiple sources of pollution and co-pollutants in the energy/transportation sectors are given priority for truly green options first. Since the New Jersey 2019 Energy Master Plan (EMP) was first released, the scientific evidence has only become more alarming. The evidence and impacts of climate change have accelerated, been more expensive and destructive to our communities, businesses, ecology and quality of life. It therefore becomes even more imperative to: ? Make the EMP a Real Executable Plan with quantifiable goals and means to achieve them ? Place a Moratorium on New Fossil Fuel Projects (power plants, pipelines, etc.) ? Address Methane Leaks by allowing no new hookups, converting to heat pumps and electric appliances ? Ban or at Least Minimize the Use of Hydrogen to only truly green fuel cells ? Address the Harms from Air Pollution using a justice and health lens ? Redefine Clean Energy and Recognize the Dangers of False “Low Carbon” Solutions and Net-Zero Emissions ? Utilize the Total Costs of Climate Harms and Costs of Mitigation in Creating Policies ? Require GHG Regulations Aligned with State Targets and Timelines ? Ensure Legislative Action, Budget, Regulations and EMP are not in Conflict Clean Water Action: Page 2 Docket No. QO24020126 1. The EMP Must Become a Real Plan The 2019 EMP called for 100% clean energy by 2050 to be accomplished in 30 years but the document was mostly aspirational without interim benchmarks and executable actions. In light of the speeding up of the climate crisis and urgency to act, the State has moved up its target to 100% clean energy by 2035. We cannot afford a plan that speaks in generalities, the 2024 EMP must contain quantifiable goals and actions, resources to accomplish them, definitions of success, timely mechanisms for adjusting and accelerating action required in the future. 2. The EMP Must Call for a Moratorium on New Fossil Fuel Projects The EMP must include a moratorium on all new fossil fuel projects and other projects such as hydrogen hubs that will emit potent GHGs. The State cannot wean itself off fossil fuel if it keeps permitting more fossil fuel infrastructure to be constructed. In the end, they will become stranded assets over time – causing both an economic hardship on power producers and ratepayers. Scare resources would be better spent on creating more truly green renewable energy sources, energy efficiency and conservation. 3. The EMP Must Address the Climate Threat from Methane Gas Leaks Methane is responsible for about 30% of climate warming in the U.S. This is because methane captures 86 times more heat than CO2 over a 20-year period. The EMP must include specific policies and programs for reducing methane emissions that go beyond utility efforts to fix leaks – a costly effort that will take years and will still not fully address the problem. The EMP must include policies and plans to prevent use of new “alternative” fuels such as biogas (which is basically methane), stop building new gas infrastructure, end new gas hookups and rapidly accelerate the use of cold weather heat pumps and other electric appliances in new and existing buildings. 4. The EMP Must Ban or at Least Minimize the Production and Use of Hydrogen A major benefit claimed for hydrogen is that it decarbonizes the atmosphere. Hydrogen itself is actually an indirect GHG and will cause warming when emitted into the atmosphere. Hydrogen has 100 times the warming effect of CO2 over a ten-year period. Hydrogen is the smallest molecule and known to easily leak into the atmosphere. A hydrogen leak rate of 10% across the value chain making production and distribution of hydrogen three times worse in terms of climate impacts than methane. Methane’s 10-year global warming power is about 104 (close to hydrogen’s) but its life cycle leak rate is only 3% due to its larger molecular size. Hydrogen has the added problems of causing embrittlement, increasing the rate at which its infrastructure leaks. Clean Water Action: Page 3 Docket No. QO24020126 NJ should not allow the combusting any type of hydrogen in a power plant as it leads to formation of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions up to six times that of methane. NOx is a powerful GHG with a lifetime of about 10 years that captures almost 30 times the amount of heat as CO2. NOx is also an ozone precursor. The disproportionate health impacts of largely EJ communities living near power plants would heighten rates of heart disease, asthma, birth defects, premature death and more. Therefore, the only uses of hydrogen that should be permitted are for applications that only involve green hydrogen in fuel cells to produce electricity. No burning of hydrogen should be allowed. 5. The EMP Must Address the Harms from Air Pollution and Set Appropriate Goals While controlling or minimizing the emissions of harmful air pollutants is not the subject of the EMP, Clean Water Action calls on the NJBPU to include specific goals in the next version of the EMP for reducing harmful co-pollutants, especially in EJ communities, commensurate with the goals of reducing GHGs. 6. The EMP Must Redefine Clean Energy and Recognize the Dangers of False “Low Carbon” Solutions and the Target of Net-Zero Emissions The original goal of the 2019 EMP was 100% carbon neutral (net-zero) energy by 2050. Since then the State has accelerated its goal of 100% clean energy by 2035. However, the definition of “clean” includes dirty technologies such as burning carbon-based fuels like, ineffective market-based schemes such as carbon offsets, pollution credits and other pay to pollute schemes, garbage incineration, aging and new nuclear power plants, and more fossil fuel power projects with carbon capture and storage, an expensive technology that has never shown any commercial or practical viability. Any and all of these options disproportionately impact low-income communities and communities of color and block progress towards achieving the 100% renewable energy economy we urgently need. The EMP must clarify the definition of clean energy to exclude these dirty solutions and only allow the use of truly clean renewable energy technologies such as solar, wind, geothermal, heat pump and tidal, along with storage. The EMP must also recognize and address the danger of net-zero emissions technologies. NJ legislators are currently proposing bills that are based on the use of technologies that would purportedly achieve only net-zero emissions or even worse would use carbon-based fuels that only have lower GHG emissions than current fuels - not zero emissions. Removing methane and diesel pollutants (particularly Black Carbon, or soot) would result in a much faster and more potent global warming reduction than removal of CO2 which remains in the atmosphere for extended periods of time. Clean Water Action: Page 4 Docket No. QO24020126 We must reach net-zero more swiftly by committing to only using zero-emissions technologies, such as wind, solar, hydroelectric, heat pumps, tidal and storage, while protecting natural carbon sinks, mainly wetlands and forests. These technologies immediately reduce total atmospheric carbon. We must not use technologies such as RNG to achieve net-zero as they only make it more costly and take longer to convert to zero-emissions technologies. 7. The EMP Must Utilize the True and Total Costs of Climate Change Harms, Adaptation and the Costs of Mitigation in Creating Policies and Prescribing Actions The total life cycle economic, social and health costs of burning fossil fuels, as well as methane and hydrogen leakage (both however produced), including the costs from co-pollutant emissions, must be disclosed and utilized by the EMP in setting policies. This includes direct and indirect costs from the harms caused by these emissions as well as the cost to adapt to these emissions. The costs of harms and adaptation must be compared to the costs to mitigate/prevent these harms in order to fully understand the financial tradeoffs and make the best long term decisions for the State. As reported in the April edition of Nature, the costs from climate change damages outweigh mitigation costs by a factor of six. 8. The EMP Must Require GHG Regulations Aligned with State Targets As mentioned earlier the 2019 EMP set goals and called for regulation of all GHGs in order to achieve NJ’s GHG reduction targets. Five years later, despite creation of the NJ Protect Against Climate Threats (NJPACT) program, which implemented limited regulations of GHGs only from power plants, but not for our dirty peaker plants. In contrast, New York has plans to replace all its dirty peakers with storage and wind power. Additionally, NJ does not have a set of regulations for each industry sector (transportation, residential, commercial, industrial, waste management, natural gas and other non-energy sources) that can clearly demonstrate they will meet State GHG reduction targets (50% by 2030) and clean energy (100% by 2035). 9. The EMP Must Acknowledge and Address the Problems Caused by the Lack of a Real Plan Without a comprehensive Energy Master Plan with definitive timelines, and actions, the various branches of government are often at odds with one another and acting under pressure at cross purposes. Clean Water Action: Page 5 Docket No. QO24020126 Legislators are writing their own clean energy plan without consideration of EMP or GWRA. They are bowing to pressure from fossil fuel companies to pass legislation such as the Low Carbon Fuel Standard, the Emissions Reduction Innovation Act and the Renewable Natural Gas Act which mandate false solution type fuels (RNG, biogas, biomass-based diesel, fuels from carbon capture hydrogen, ethanol, etc.) for buildings and transportation. This will increase the cost of heating and transportation fuels, prolong the use of fossil fuels and fossil fuel infrastructure, increase deadly air pollution, create fraud prone carbon credit schemes, slow down the installation of true zero emissions technologies and increase GHG emissions regardless of the EMP targets. Under the current administration, the DEP has regulations that will prolong the use of dirty peaker plants and may approve permits for new fossil fuel projects (powerplants, pipelines, compressor stations etc.). The governor promotes the transition to EVs but is proposing to take away purchasing incentives (sales tax exemption) while proposing an annual tax on EVs. The NJDOT is moving forward on a major long-term highway expansion project with no consideration of the impact on climate change. This work of converting the Garden State to a green energy state is challenging enough; but when the legislative and executive branches work at cross purposes makes it almost impossible to move forward. This has to stop! A real energy master plan must have measurable timelines and benchmarks that meet the legal obligation of existing law and policy, sufficient resources to accomplish the stated goals, elimination of subsidies and give aways to fossil fuels and false solutions. The time to act is now! Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Cc: Governor Murphy Christine Guhl-Sadovy Shawn LaTourette Eric Miller Henry Gajda Chance Lykins EMP Comments to NJBPU Clean Water Action.June 2024
Kirsten Millar6/10/2024 4:16:07 PM5 pages of attached Comments2024.06.05 Comments on New Jersey Energy Master Plan - Virtual Peaker
Mark Canright6/8/2024 4:38:25 PMGreetings! I am a farmer who cares about transitioning away from fossil fuels and towards renewable energy. Solar and wind create thousands of jobs, help us achieve energy independence and keep our air and water clean. I respectfully express my support for solar energy and request that it be a main component of the upcoming Master Energy Plan. I also request that the Master Energy Plan stop relying on polluting fossil fuels that harm our health and communities. Let's work together to invest in expanding solar, wind and other renewables. Thank you for your time and consideration! 
Thomas E Lang6/7/2024 1:08:44 PMI've had solar power for a few years and I love it! I recommend solar to ALL my friends. Most of whom are retired and on limited incomes. in a world where utilities prices are constantly on the rise it's awesome to have an alternative.  
Dan Aschenbach6/7/2024 12:55:03 PMNJ BPU should be stressing the importance of electricity reliability and affordability. NJ BPU has left the role of regulator for that of advocate in energy policy. My opinion NJ Energy Master Plan 2024 NJ BPU comment
Patricia Idrobo6/7/2024 12:23:22 PMI strongly support provisions in the Master Energy Plan to prioritize clean, renewable energy and addressing climate change. Please accelerate the transition to renewable energies like solar, community solar, wind, offshore wind, geothermal, and others, as well as energy efficiency and electric cars. 
Pete McCarthy6/7/2024 12:05:28 PMPlease continue expanding NJ good planes for clean green energy now and in future . Ive had solar PV panels on my shop roof for over 22 yrs ( with help from NJ ) 3 yrs ago purchased 2013 Fiat 500e over 20,000 miles almost for free ,must admit this winter I had to pay almost $30 one month ,cold /overcast ect. Only regret is not doing it sooner Thanks Pete  
Kathryn Riss6/7/2024 7:16:42 AMAs a participant in Piscataway's Community Solar program, I am happy to endorse solar energy in general and community solar in particular and request that they be featured in New Jersey's Energy Master plan! As a resident along the Raritan River having experienced three "100-year" floods over the past quarter century, I can personally vouch that the threat posed by global heating caused by reliance on fossil fuels is real, growing, and exceedingly dangerous. Please take the steps NOW that climate scientists have been warning us about for decades and now urgently demand. STOP ALL fossil fuel infrastructure projects in New Jersey and move ASAP to replace them with renewable energy sources: solar, wind, geothermal, hydro and nuclear. Save the future viability of our planet! 
John Ruhl6/6/2024 7:37:10 PMI wish to express my support for solar energy, wind energy, and other non-polluting forms of energy and request that it be a main component of the upcoming Master Energy Plan. I also request that the Master Energy Plan cease reliance on polluting fossil fuels that harm our health and communities. Nowhere is this more critical than New Jersey because NJ is the most densely populated state in the U.S.A. New Jersey needs to continue demonstrating to the rest of the nation that we are a leader in forward-thinking polices and actions. 
Raymond Valinoti6/6/2024 6:53:41 PMI support solar energy. Solar energy should be a main component of the upcoming Master Energy Plan. The Master Energy Plan should also stop relying on polluting fossil fuels that hurt our health and our communities. 
Brian Thompson6/6/2024 4:41:45 PMI strongly urge our master plan to accelerate solar power, along with current plans for wind energy. Unfortunately much of our power comes from natural gas, which contributes to global warming through extraction and leaks during transportation. Combined with new mega batteries, solar and wind are now balancing grids—period. But with a year of record high temps for the past year essentially hitting the 1.5C mark set in Paris 9 years ago, we simply cannot move fast enough. 
Knute Jensen6/6/2024 3:45:48 PMsee attachedKJ comments on EMP 2024
Denise Lytle5/30/2024 6:13:10 PMI urge the strategic, equitable and cost-effective decarbonization of our top three most carbon emitting sectors, transportation, buildings and energy generation while simultaneously modernizing and updating their connective tissue, the grid. The updated EMP must build on the successes of the current 2019 EMP including the cost effective electrification of the building and transportation sectors powered by 100% clean renewable electricity. The impacts of indoor and outdoor air pollution are disproportionately borne by low-income households and communities of color. Reducing indoor and outdoor air pollution is particularly important to New Jersey because asthma is an ongoing public health challenge for the state. Over a third of New Jersey’s counties received a “D” grade or below for ground-level ozone by The American Lung Association. More than 17,600 deaths annually are directly linked to air pollution in New Jersey based on recent research from the Harvard School of Public Health. Environment New Jersey Research and Policy Center’s 2021 “Trouble in the Air” report found that the New York-Newark-Jersey City metro area, home to more than 19 million people, experienced 47 bad-air days in 2020. If the state does not prioritize overburdened communities, it will further exacerbate poverty and health disparities, and New Jersey will not reach its clean energy goals. In New Jersey, buildings powered by fossil fuels contribute more than four times more outdoor nitrogen oxides (a precursor to smog) than electricity generation. New Jersey has among the highest health burdens of any state from outdoor air pollution directly related to combustion of fossil fuels in buildings — with over 250 premature deaths and $2.8 billion in monetized health impacts annually, the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health found. The proposed EMP must prioritize the full decarbonization of our buildings and to simultaneously prepare our homes and buildings to be safe, healthy and efficient so that the energy savings do not leak out through the drafty windows. Replacing fossil fuel-burning equipment like gas furnaces, propane boilers, and more with highly efficient electric heat pumps will cut climate pollution from buildings. Electrifying our homes and business is more energy efficient - heat pumps are 3 to 5 times more energy efficient than a similar fossil fuel heating system. As fossil fuel costs continue to climb, New Jerseyans who make the switch from gas to highly efficient electric cold climate heat pumps can save anywhere from 4% to 41% on their annual energy bills, depending on utility territory In order to address the high cost of living here in NJ, the updated EMP must support lowering emissions and energy burdens by deeply subsidizing residential multi-family units’ transition to electric. Federal and state incentives, particularly federal incentives for low- and moderate-income New Jerseyans through the Inflation Reduction Act, help significantly offset costs for electrical upgrades and heat pumps. New Jersey has a lot of older housing stock, which tends to be more likely to suffer from “leakage”. Low- and moderate-income residents are more likely to live in older housing stock because rent prices tend to be lower, which increases their energy burdens due to excessive heating or cooling. The updated EMP must ensure effective Energy Efficiency and electrification programs, so that building decarbonization can be more easily addressed holistically. This is the promise of the whole home pilot program, which expands upon some existing programs, where their shortfalls are that they can’t address other problems in the home, like asbestos or a damaged roof. The whole home pilot program is the gold standard as a home’s concerns can be addressed all at once and retrofitted to the desire of the resident. However, there has been limited utilization of the program to date in Trenton. The EMP must ensure that residents can opt-in and make this program extremely affordable to the low- and moderate-income residents who opt in. Most importantly, this work must continue to prioritize LMI households, which are the most likely to reside in unhealthy and inefficient homes. We strongly urge the Board to administer the Comfort Partners Program so that the folks that need to be prioritized are, and no one is left behind regardless of their utility. Phasing out gas is critical to meeting decarbonization and public health objectives, and thus long-term planning must be deployed to align utilities’ goals with those decarbonization goals. Investments geared towards extending the longevity of gas pipeline networks must not be favored, instead the state should be focused on encouraging the deployment of clean energy, including wind, solar, and storage technologies, to achieve decarbonization. 100% clean electricity means cleaner air and improved public health, creation of good local union jobs, energy independence, and bold action on climate change. The Governor’s goals of 100% clean electricity by 2035 is ambitious and attainable, and the EMP must create the framework for our state to meet the goal while providing certainty for utilities, energy suppliers, and businesses. 100% clean electricity by 2035 must genuinely mean clean energy – which does not include trash incinerators or false energy solutions like blended hydrogen and renewable natural gas. The previous EMP noted that most of our clean energy would be met with offshore wind and solar. Offshore wind is a burgeoning industry, and with the Governor’s latest stated goal of 11,000 MW by 2040, and the latest offshore wind solicitation that just opened, we feel encouraged that we can meet the 100% goal while creating good-paying in-state jobs, solidifying New Jersey as the east coast leader in offshore wind, and producing local, clean energy to reduce air pollution and address climate change. Solar is a well-accepted and continually growing clean energy industry. A combination between grid-connected, residential and community solar will provide New Jerseyans with energy independence, clean energy opportunities, and cost savings to their wallet. Community solar allows renters and low-income residents to access clean energy while reducing their energy burdens. With energy year 2025 promising at least 500 MW of community solar energy, nearly 4 times the capacity as previous years, residents will have more access than ever to this vital program. With the current goals of 2,000 MW by 2030, we encourage the Board to accelerate developing strong incentive structures for energy storage in the state, and consider marrying that with small-scale, residential incentives so that households that may lose power can also take advantage of energy storage. Given that offshore wind and solar are not demand-response energy types, energy storage for clean, renewable energy will allow New Jerseyans to continue drawing clean energy even when the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing. Transportation is the largest source of carbon emissions in the state – representing 38% of emissions in 2021. Decarbonizing this sector is essential to meeting our climate goals, reducing air pollution, and protecting the health of all New Jerseyans, especially members of environmental justice communities that are adjacent to and most impacted by highways and vehicular pollution. The 2019 EMP overarchingly supports: decarbonize through rapid electrification, reduce vehicle miles traveled, reduce reliance on single passenger vehicles, and exploration of alternatives for hard-to-electrify transportation like aviation. We agree that these are the right tactics, however funding and educational campaigns need to ramp up in order to make these transitions such as adopting electric vehicles, and cultural shifts such as using public transit a reality. We urge the Board to move forward the Medium- and Heavy Duty Straw Proposal, which is significantly delayed so that utilities can employ strategic plans on charging infrastructure across the state with the purpose of transitioning and powering one of our most polluting sources of emissions in our most polluting sector, our trucks. Finalizing the Straw proposal will better enable entities like New Jersey Transit and school districts–many of whom have received federal grant money towards clean school buses–to speed the efficient, cost-effective integration of electric vehicles into their fleets. The state needs significant and consistent funding to electrify fleets and medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, establishment of sufficient charging infrastructure, and enhance public transit in a timely manner. The recent passing of the punitive $250 per year registration fee, which is scheduled to increase to $290 per year over the next few years, moves us in the wrong direction and discourages the transition to electric vehicles in the near term.  
Scott Carlin5/29/2024 10:11:19 PMSee the attached file.CARLIN EMP Talking Points 2024-May 29
Alejandro Meseguer5/29/2024 8:26:06 PMPlease read attachment.EMP Talking Points 2024
Alejandro Meseguer5/29/2024 8:25:07 PMTransportation Transportation is the largest source of carbon emissions in the state – representing 38% of emissions in 2021. Decarbonizing this sector is essential to meeting our climate goals, reducing air pollution, and protecting the health of all New Jerseyans, especially members of environmental justice communities that are adjacent to and most impacted by highways and vehicular pollution. The 2019 EMP overarchingly supports: decarbonize through rapid electrification, reduce vehicle miles traveled, reduce reliance on single passenger vehicles, and exploration of alternatives for hard-to-electrify transportation like aviation. We agree that these are the right tactics, however funding and educational campaigns need to ramp up in order to make these transitions such as adopting electric vehicles, and cultural shifts such as using public transit a reality. We urge the Board to move forward the Medium- and Heavy Duty Straw Proposal, which is significantly delayed so that utilities can employ strategic plans on charging infrastructure across the state with the purpose of transitioning and powering one of our most polluting sources of emissions in our most polluting sector, our trucks. Finalizing the Straw proposal will better enable entities like New Jersey Transit and school districts–many of whom have received federal grant money towards clean school buses–to speed the efficient, cost-effective integration of electric vehicles into their fleets. The state needs significant and consistent funding to electrify fleets and medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, establishment of sufficient charging infrastructure, and enhance public transit in a timely manner. The recent passing of the punitive $250 per year registration fee, which is scheduled to increase to $290 per year over the next few years, moves us in the wrong direction and discourages the transition to electric vehicles in the near term.  
Alejandro Meseguer5/29/2024 8:23:07 PM100% clean electricity by 2035 Phasing out gas is critical to meeting decarbonization and public health objectives, and thus long-term planning must be deployed to align utilities’ goals with those decarbonization goals. Investments geared towards extending the longevity of gas pipeline networks must not be favored, instead the state should be focused on encouraging the deployment of clean energy, including wind, solar, and storage technologies, to achieve decarbonization. 100% clean electricity means cleaner air and improved public health, creation of good local union jobs, energy independence, and bold action on climate change. The Governor’s goals of 100% clean electricity by 2035 is ambitious and attainable, and the EMP must create the framework for our state to meet the goal while providing certainty for utilities, energy suppliers, and businesses. 100% clean electricity by 2035 must genuinely mean clean energy – which does not include trash incinerators or false energy solutions like blended hydrogen and renewable natural gas. The previous EMP noted that most of our clean energy would be met with offshore wind and solar. Offshore wind is a burgeoning industry, and with the Governor’s latest stated goal of 11,000 MW by 2040, and the latest offshore wind solicitation that just opened, we feel encouraged that we can meet the 100% goal while creating good-paying in-state jobs, solidifying New Jersey as the east coast leader in offshore wind, and producing local, clean energy to reduce air pollution and address climate change. Solar is a well-accepted and continually growing clean energy industry. A combination between grid-connected, residential and community solar will provide New Jerseyans with energy independence, clean energy opportunities, and cost savings to their wallet. Community solar allows renters and low-income residents to access clean energy while reducing their energy burdens. With energy year 2025 promising at least 500 MW of community solar energy, nearly 4 times the capacity as previous years, residents will have more access than ever to this vital program. With the current goals of 2,000 MW by 2030, we encourage the Board to accelerate developing strong incentive structures for energy storage in the state, and consider marrying that with small-scale, residential incentives so that households that may lose power can also take advantage of energy storage. Given that offshore wind and solar are not demand-response energy types, energy storage for clean, renewable energy will allow New Jerseyans to continue drawing clean energy even when the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing.  
Alejandro Meseguer5/29/2024 8:21:35 PMPlease transition to clean renewable energy and away from fossil fuels. EMP Talking Points 2024
Alejandro Meseguer5/22/2024 8:15:49 PMPlease advocate for clean renewable energy to transition away from fossil fuels. Heat pumps are here now and mature enough to heat well below freezing temperatues. Thank you NJBPU for your work in this EMP. 
Douglas Wong5/22/2024 3:50:02 PMAs a heating and AC company in NJ. We replaced existing systems with heat pumps for electric heated home and Hybrid for gas/electric homes. Converting gas heat home to HP only do not make economic sense because you mostly likely have to upgrade to a 200 amp panel and upgrade wire to furnace with 220v, 30-40 amp for electric backup heat to the air handler. Ductwork most likely need to be upgrade as well. Almost all our job includes 0% financing and large rebates, without both will reduce our conversion by at least 50%. If we want our residences in NJ continue upgrading with high efficiency furnaces, AC and heat pumps, keeping the 0% financing and attractive rebates are a must. Thank you. 
Ellen Pedersen5/21/2024 1:10:45 PMTriennium programs must maximize electrification and protect utility bills for low- and moderate-income (LMI) households in the short- and long-term. Ratepayer money must not be used to incentivize further reliance on and the longevity of dirty fossil gas in NJ. I oppose all gas equipment incentives. Building decarbonization programs should incentivize full, not hybrid end-use electrification. Utilities must provide a clear path through the programs to make homes electric- and upgrade-ready. Utilities must seek out and take full advantage of IRA funds, however these must be additive to the work and expand program offerings, not shrink the investment from the utilities in Triennium 2 programs. Geothermal can only go forward with with strong guardrails like controlled costs and no fossil-fuel supplements.  
David Temple5/18/2024 8:20:54 AMPlease do all you can to use only clean energy. We need to get away from the use of gas, coal, and oil. I am 100% in on using solar and wind power to provide clean energy. 
Matthew Linda 5/16/2024 12:01:54 PMKindly view MBL Technology's solid waste processing technology @ www.mbltechnology.com Let's talk to save our planet and environment for the next generation. 
John Belo5/16/2024 10:03:18 AMI would like to know when the HEEHRA will be up and running, I’ve been in contact with several people in the administration, and they stated that the program would be effective in December 2023, no later than January 2024. Personally I need to upgrade my heating/cooling system and would like to go to a more effective and clean system, but without knowing when the program would be effective, I can’t make any decisions, or because the system has completely failed(thankfully we made through the winter) I may have to go with a traditional system due to price constraints. Any guidance that you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. 
Alejandro Meseguer4/25/2024 2:33:35 PMWe support Wind energy in New Jersey!NJSC OSW BOEM TP
Alejandro Meseguer4/24/2024 1:22:41 PMThe value of offshore wind "Offshore wind has a compelling and distinctive value proposition that complements other clean resources. It supports grid reliability and resource diversity, with average capacity factors higher than those typical of onshore wind and solar PV projects, and a complementary production profile particularly suited to meet winter load growth (acute in colder climates, where electrification will drive higher winter peaks). Offshore wind helps relieve siting pressure for land-based clean power and transmission infrastructure, connecting directly to coastal population centers with high electricity demand. It can also drive economic development, providing sustainable opportunities for jobs, manufacturing, and revitalized legacy maritime and grid infrastructure. The sector also has long-term cost reduction potential as the industry scales in the U.S." --- U.S. Department of EnergyLiftoff-Report-Offshore-Wind-Web2
Alejandro Meseguer4/24/2024 1:19:01 PM"The value of offshore wind Offshore wind has a compelling and distinctive value proposition that complements other clean resources. It supports grid reliability and resource diversity, with average capacity factors higher than those typical of onshore wind and solar PV projects, and a complementary production profile particularly suited to meet winter load growth (acute in colder climates, where electrification will drive higher winter peaks). Offshore wind helps relieve siting pressure for land-based clean power and transmission infrastructure, connecting directly to coastal population centers with high electricity demand. It can also drive economic development, providing sustainable opportunities for jobs, manufacturing, and revitalized legacy maritime and grid infrastructure. The sector also has long-term cost reduction potential as the industry scales in the U.S." U.S. DOE  
Alejandro Meseguer4/24/2024 1:14:19 PM"Offshore wind power can play a critical role in both near-term and long-term decarbonization of the U.S. energy system. Decarbonizing to tackle the climate crisis while meeting electricity load growth will require fast deployment of clean sources. Offshore wind promises to help meet demand growth by providing near-term deployment at scale, particularly for land-constrained coastal demand centers that have limited clean electricity alternatives and might otherwise need to add new natural gas or delay fossil fuel retirement." Pathways to Commercial Liftoff: Offshore Wind 
Alejandro Meseguer4/24/2024 1:06:40 PM"Offshore wind power has a compelling and distinctive value proposition that complements other clean resources, with high capacity factors and strong winter production."  
Alejandro Meseguer4/24/2024 1:04:08 PMOSW offers an opportunity to supplement Solar, Enhanced Geothermal, Green Hydrogen energy sources necessary to secure our clean energy future to protect the health of an entire generation of children.Liftoff-OnePager-Offshore-Wind-Web
Alejandro Meseguer4/24/2024 12:52:13 PMWe support the development of all renewable clean sources of energy in New Jersey.NJSC OSW BOEM TP
Margaret Bagley3/25/2024 7:19:00 PMAs a lifetime resident of NJ I vehemently oppose the OSW plan for NJ's energy future. This plan is invasive and destructive to our most valued resource, our shore and coastline. Referring to these turbines as "clean" and "green" are merely buzz words which convince proponents that they are in fact all of that. BOEM themselves have been quoted in the EIS for Ocean Wind 1, now cancelled, will have no overall collective impact on global warming as a result of the OSW projects. These 1000 foot behemoths will serve as a constant reminder that this department was more motivated by funding then to preserve the necessary ecosystem that is far more valuable than a few unreliable gigawatts which based on the onshore landing diagrams will be supporting NY & PA far more than NJ. Harming our fisheries and marine life is evident whether some choose to admit it or not. Common sense and anyone with a conscience will tell you that animals flee harm and that's what simply is happening. I would like to hear from the BPU what advances and consideration towards nuclear energy you have taken, which is a "clean" source of energy that is far more reliable than OSW, and would also like to hear the BPU's Plan B when the OSW plan fails and inevitably blackouts and brownouts occur. This should not be the only alternative to ramp down fossil fuel usage which natural gas was considered "clean" at it's inception. Please take the time to do the right thing by NJ residents and ratepayers. The BPU has an opportunity to be honest and look towards a much more affordable, reliable and less destructive energy source that won't further industrialize NJ. Pushing through an "agenda" because the gauntlet has been thrown and a "timeline" has been established is no way to responsibly solve our energy needs. It will go down as lots of money wasted for a fast tracked program that is short-sighted for our future needs unless you do the right thing and halt OSW construction.  

Follow NJBPU on Social Media

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Instagram YouTube
NJBPU on Twitter
NJBPU on Facebook
Statewide: NJ Home | Services A to Z | Departments/Agencies | FAQs
BPU: Home | About BPU | Commercial Customers | Residential Customers | Newsroom | Customer Assistance | Board Agenda Business | Related Links