Search in:



Docket # : Open Date : Divisions :
ENERGY DIVISION / PRIMARY
Case Status : Last Update :
Case Caption :
Showing result(s) 1 - 9 of 9
 Docket #Document TitleFolderUploaded ByDescriptionPosted Date
ET21101152- 7-13-22-2F ORDERSBPU Staff7-13-22-2F07/15/2022
ET21101152- ACE - RNEM LETTER ANSWER TO INTERSECT - ET21101152 - 12-9-2021 CORRESPONDENCEBPU StaffACE - RNEM LETTER ANSWER TO INTERSECT - ET21101152 - 12-9-202112/10/2021
ET21101152- ACE - RNM TARIFF FILING - ET21101152 - 3-16-2022 TARIFFSBPU StaffACE - RNM TARIFF FILING - ET21101152 - 3-16-202203/21/2022
ET21101152- ACE - RNM TARIFF FILING - ET21101152 - 7-27-2022 TARIFFSBPU StaffACE - RNM TARIFF FILING - ET21101152 - 7-27-202207/27/2022
ET21101152- ET21101152 - ACE - Letter Petition - Remote Net Energy Metering - 10-1-2021 PETITIONSBPU StaffET21101152 ACE - LETTER PETITION - REMOTE NET ENERGY METERING - 10-1-202110/01/2021
ET21101152- ET21101152 - SARAH H. STEINDEL (DIV. OF RATE COUNSEL) SUBMITTED AN UPDATED SERVICE LIST IN REF TO THE PETITION OF (ACE) REQUESTING APPROVAL CORRESPONDENCEBPU StaffET21101152 - SARAH H. STEINDEL (DIV. OF RATE COUNSEL) SUBMITTED AN UPDATED SERVICE LIST IN REF TO THE PETITION OF (ACE) REQUESTING APPROVAL10/20/2021
ET21101152- ET21101152 - SARAH H. STEINDEL (DIV. OF RATE COUNSEL) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE PET. OF (ACE) REQUESTING APPROVAL OF IT RIDER REMOTE NET ENERGY METERING TARIFF COMMENTSBPU StaffET21101152 - SARAH H. STEINDEL (DIV. OF RATE COUNSEL) SUBMITTED COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE PET. OF (ACE) REQUESTING APPROVAL OF IT RIDER REMOTE NET ENERGY METERING TARIFF06/24/2022
ET21101152- ET21101152 COMMENTS COMMENTSBPU StaffET21101152 COMMENTS12/13/2021
ET21101152- ET21101152 INTERSECT ENERGY, LLC COMMENTS COMMENTSBPU StaffET21101152 INTERSECT ENERGY, LLC COMMENTS11/26/2021
Showing result(s) 1 - 1 of 1
Showing result(s) 1 - 1 of 1
Showing result(s) 1 - 1 of 1
Posted ByPosted DateCommentsAttachments(s)
Anthony Fotopoulos10/22/2021 1:33:50 AMComment re: last sentence of the 2nd paragraph of the proposed Rider RNM - "None of the accounts can […] be a NEM customer." The RNM language approved by the BPU for JCP&L does not have this exclusion. We suggest striking the portion about NEM customers so the last sentence reads "None of the accounts can be included in a previous aggregation for another qualified customer facility.". Keystone_Rider RNM_Comments_v1.0

Follow NJBPU on Social Media

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Instagram YouTube
NJBPU on Twitter
NJBPU on Facebook
Statewide: NJ Home | Services A to Z | Departments/Agencies | FAQs
BPU: Home | About BPU | Commercial Customers | Residential Customers | Newsroom | Customer Assistance | Board Agenda Business | Related Links