Search in:



Docket # : Open Date : Divisions :
CLEAN ENERGY DIVISION / PRIMARY
Case Status : Last Update :
Case Caption :
Showing result(s) 1 - 36 of 36
 Docket #Document TitleFolderUploaded ByDescriptionPosted Date
QO21071023- 2021-09-23 - School Small Business EE Comments - PSEG - Lopez COMMENTSBPU Staff2021-09-23 - School Small Business EE Comments - PSEG - Lopez09/23/2021
QO21071023- 2022-01-20 - Energy and Water Benchmarking Straw Proposal - PSEG Comments COMMENTSBPU Staff2022-01-20 - Energy and Water Benchmarking Straw Proposal - PSEG Comments01/20/2022
QO21071023- 7-12-23-8F ORDERSBPU Staff7-12-23-8F07/17/2023
QO21071023- 9-7-22-8C ORDERSBPU Staff9-7-22-8C09/08/2022
QO21071023- Benchmarking Comments from Willdan COMMENTSBPU StaffBenchmarking Comments from Willdan01/19/2022
QO21071023- DOCKET NO. QO21071023 - BRUCE SHAPIRO COMMENTSBPU StaffDOCKET NO. QO21071023 - BRUCE SHAPIRO01/18/2022
QO21071023- Docket No. QO21071023 Comments Rockland Electric Company 1-20-2022 COMMENTSBPU StaffDocket No. QO21071023 Comments Rockland Electric Company 1-20-202201/20/2022
QO21071023- Docket QO21071023 BP RE Energy and Water Benchmarking of Commercial Buildings 1.20.22 COMMENTSBPU StaffDocket QO21071023 BP RE Energy and Water Benchmarking of Commercial Buildings 1.20.2201/20/2022
QO21071023- EEA-NJ Benchmarking Straw Proposal Commnets COMMENTSBPU StaffEEA-NJ Benchmarking Straw Proposal Commnets 01/20/2022
QO21071023- HCANJ Clean Energy Act of 2018 Benchmarking Requirement Comments COMMENTSBPU StaffHCANJ Clean Energy Act of 2018 Benchmarking Requirement Comments01/19/2022
QO21071023- IMO Implementation of P.L. 2018, c.17 Energy & Water Benchmarking of Commercial; BPU Dkt. No. QO21071023 COMMENTSBPU StaffIMO Implementation of P.L. 2018, c.17 Energy & Water Benchmarking of Commercial; BPU Dkt. No. QO2107102301/20/2022
QO21071023- MaGrann Comments NJ Benchmarking Straw 012022 COMMENTSBPU StaffMaGrann Comments NJ Benchmarking Straw 01202201/20/2022
QO21071023- NEEP_NJ_BPU_Benchmarking_Comment COMMENTSBPU StaffNEEP_NJ_BPU_Benchmarking_Comment01/20/2022
QO21071023- NJBA Comments on BPU Commercial Building Benchmarking Proposal (1) COMMENTSBPU StaffNJBA Comments on BPU Commercial Building Benchmarking Proposal (1)01/20/2022
QO21071023- NJDRC COMMENTS - IMO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF P.L. 2018, C.17 ENERGY AND WATER BENCHMARKING, ET AL. BPU DOCKET NO. QO21071023 COMMENTSBPU StaffNJDRC COMMENTS - IMO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF P.L. 2018, C.17 ENERGY AND WATER BENCHMARKING, ET AL. BPU DOCKET NO. QO2107102301/31/2023
QO21071023- NOTICE__STAKEHOLDERMEETING_BENCHMARKINGNON_REGULATED_UTILITIES NOTICESBPU StaffNOTICE__STAKEHOLDERMEETING_BENCHMARKINGNON_REGULATED_UTILITIES12/29/2022
QO21071023- PSEG Comments - NJ Energy and Water Benchmarking Program COMMENTSBPU StaffPSEG Comments - NJ Energy and Water Benchmarking Program01/30/2023
QO21071023- Q021071023 NJBPU_LETTER_RE_BENCHMARKING 2022.1.17 COMMENTSBPU StaffQ021071023 NJBPU_LETTER_RE_BENCHMARKING 2022.1.1701/18/2022
QO21071023- QO210710123 JBA COMMENT RE ENERGY & WATER BENCHING DOCKET NO COMMENTSBPU StaffQO210710123 JBA COMMENT RE ENERGY & WATER BENCHING DOCKET NO01/20/2022
QO21071023- QO21071023 PSEG COMMENTS - NJ ENERGY AND WATER BENCHMARKING PROGRAM COMMENTSBPU StaffQO21071023 PSEG COMMENTS - NJ ENERGY AND WATER BENCHMARKING PROGRAM01/31/2023
QO21071023- QO21071023 - AIDA CAMACHO-WELCH (BPU) SUBMITTED A NOTICE OF A PUBLIC STAKEHOLDER MEETING FOR JANUARY 6, 2022 AT 10 A.M. VIA ZOOM NOTICESBPU StaffQO21071023 - AIDA CAMACHO-WELCH (BPU) SUBMITTED A NOTICE OF A PUBLIC STAKEHOLDER MEETING FOR JANUARY 6, 2022 AT 10 A.M. VIA ZOOM12/17/2021
QO21071023- QO21071023 - AIDA CAMACHO-WELCH (BPU) SUBMITTED A PUBLIC NOTICE OF AN UPCOMING STAKEHOLDER MEETING FOR 9.13.21 AT 3PM (VIRTUAL) NOTICESBPU StaffQO21071023 - AIDA CAMACHO-WELCH (BPU) SUBMITTED A PUBLIC NOTICE OF AN UPCOMING STAKEHOLDER MEETING FOR 9.13.21 AT 3PM (VIRTUAL)09/20/2021
QO21071023- QO21071023 - BENCHMARKING - NOTICE OF STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS RE APARTMENT BUILDING OWNER NOTICESBPU StaffQO21071023 - BENCHMARKING - NOTICE OF STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS RE APARTMENT BUILDING OWNER02/28/2023
QO21071023- QO21071023 BUILDING BENCHMARKING POLICY COMMENTS REVIREO COMMENTSBPU StaffQO21071023 BUILDING BENCHMARKING POLICY COMMENTS REVIREO01/21/2022
QO21071023- QO21071023 IMO IMPLEMENTATION OF P.L. 2018, C.17 ENERGY & WATER BENCHMARKING OF COMMERCIAL COMMENTSBPU StaffQO21071023 IMO IMPLEMENTATION OF P.L. 2018, C.17 ENERGY & WATER BENCHMARKING OF COMMERCIAL01/21/2022
QO21071023- QO21071023 JCPL BENCHMARKING COMMENTS - 01-30-23 COMMENTSBPU StaffQO21071023 JCPL BENCHMARKING COMMENTS - 01-30-2301/31/2023
QO21071023- QO21071023 - NAIOP NEW JERSEY CHAPTER COMMENTSBPU StaffQO21071023 - NAIOP NEW JERSEY CHAPTER01/20/2022
QO21071023- QO21071023 BENCHMARKING - NOTICE - DEC 16 2021_TN NOTICESBPU StaffQO21071023 BENCHMARKING - NOTICE - DEC 16 2021_TN01/07/2022
QO21071023- QO21071023 BPU Energy Water Benchmarking Initiative Comments - SJG_ETG COMMENTSBPU StaffQO21071023 BPU Energy Water Benchmarking Initiative Comments - SJG_ETG01/20/2022
QO21071023- QO21071023 BPU ENERGY WATER BENCHMARKING INITIATIVE COMMENTS - SJG_ETG COMMENTSBPU StaffQO21071023 BPU ENERGY WATER BENCHMARKING INITIATIVE COMMENTS - SJG_ETG01/20/2022
QO21071023- QO21071023 EEA-NJ BENCHMARKING STRAW PROPOSAL COMMNETS COMMENTSBPU StaffQO21071023 EEA-NJ BENCHMARKING STRAW PROPOSAL COMMNETS01/20/2022
QO21071023- QO21071023- ENERGY AND WATER BENCHMARKING STRAW PROPOSAL - PSEG COMMENTS COMMENTSBPU StaffQO21071023- ENERGY AND WATER BENCHMARKING STRAW PROPOSAL - PSEG COMMENTS01/21/2022
QO21071023- QO21071023 NJBPU BENCHMARKING RULE PROPOSAL COMMENTS FROM UTILITY ADVANTAGE LLC JANUARY 20 2022 COMMENTSBPU StaffQO21071023 NJBPU BENCHMARKING RULE PROPOSAL COMMENTS FROM UTILITY ADVANTAGE LLC JANUARY 20 202201/20/2022
QO21071023- QO21071023 NJUA COMMENTS - IMO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF P.L. 2018 C.17 ENERGY AND WATER BENCHMARKING OF COMMERCIAL - FINAL COMMENTSBPU StaffQO21071023 NJUA COMMENTS - IMO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF P.L. 2018 C.17 ENERGY AND WATER BENCHMARKING OF COMMERCIAL - FINAL01/20/2022
QO21071023- QO21071023 NRDC COMMENTS- BUILDING BENCHMARKING COMMENTSBPU StaffQO21071023 NRDC COMMENTS- BUILDING BENCHMARKING01/20/2022
QO21071023- QO21071023 STATE OF NJ BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES NJ47237-A NOTICESBPU StaffQO21071023 STATE OF NJ BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES NJ47237-A04/11/2024
Showing result(s) 1 - 1 of 1
Showing result(s) 0 - 0 of 0
Showing result(s) 1 - 16 of 16
Posted ByPosted DateCommentsAttachments(s)
Danielle Lopez1/30/2023 5:00:11 PMPSE&G's January 31, 2023 Comments.PSEG Comments - NJ Energy and Water Benchmarking Program
Patricia Hanley, BOMA Association Executive1/20/2022 6:17:01 PMBOMA NJ our comments were submitted earlier today prior to the 5:00 PM deadline but I see they are not on the roster. Here they are again Thank you. BOMA NJ Comments Uploaded to BPU January 20, 2022 BPU Docket No. QO21071023 Dear Secretary Camacho-Welch: On behalf of BOMA NJ, the Building Owners and Managers Association of New Jersey, thank you for the opportunity to share our comments and concerns relative to the Board of Public Utilities’ Building Energy and Water Benchmarking Straw Proposal. BOMA NJ acknowledges that climate change is real, and we commend the BPU and Governor Murphy’s Administration for efforts to minimize its damaging effects on the natural and built environments, and our citizens. We consider energy benchmarking a valuable tool that provides building owners and managers with information needed to implement and evaluate efficiency measures. Many of our members have been benchmarking for some time, and are very focused on building performance and sustainability due to ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance), a global business consideration of increasing importance to commercial real estate as investors are evaluating these non-financial factors as they analyze risks and growth opportunities. However, members have raised concerns about the Straw Proposal’s “Public Disclosure” and “BPU” data disclosure requirements. We understand that, currently, the EPA simply requires third-party certification for Energy Star Building Labels, and we recommend that the New Jersey program do the same. Given that Energy Star Scores (half being above average and half being below average) are often misunderstood or misinterpreted by the general public, we see no value (only potential negative consequences) in “displaying a poster in the building”. The “building-level database” should be an opt-in choice, and the “program report” should include information in the aggregate, with specific buildings identified only if the owner agrees. Also, “transactional disclosure” should apply only upon the buyer’s request during its sale contract due diligence period. Finally, and appreciative of the potential benefits of requiring BPU disclosure of scores or its access to any EPA Portfolio Manager Energy Star benchmarking account data, for security and privacy concerns, disclosure of this nature should be an opt-in choice. We also caution the BPU that fines and high costs (time and money) for compliance are counterproductive in an already expensive and overly regulated state. By the BPU’s own admission, significant training and education will be required for everyone involved in this process (owners and managers, utilities, and consultants). Requiring benchmarking compliance for participation in other BPU programs and incentives may be reasonable, making a building’s compliance status public when non-compliance may be due to a clerical error or an appeal is not reasonable. Thank you for your consideration. BOMA NJ looks forward to serving as a resource as the BPU finalizes and implements this program. Sincerely, Patricia Hanley BOMA Association Executive 
Karen Forbes1/20/2022 4:55:11 PMIMO Implementation of P.L. 2018, c.17 Energy & Water Benchmarking of Commercial; BPU Dkt. No. QO21071023IMO Implementation of P.L. 2018, c.17 Energy & Water Benchmarking of Commercial; BPU Dkt. No. QO21071023
Danielle Lopez1/20/2022 4:52:48 PMPSE&G Comments - Energy and Water Benchmarking of Commercial Buildings2022-01-20 - Energy and Water Benchmarking Straw Proposal - PSEG Comments
Kyle Holder1/20/2022 4:49:40 PMThe New Jersey Builders Association submits the attached comment letter in response to Docket #Q021071023.NJBA Comments on BPU Commercial Building Benchmarking Proposal (1)
Ben Adams1/20/2022 4:01:08 PMMaGrann comments attached re NJ Commercial Benchmarking StrawMaGrann Comments NJ Benchmarking Straw 012022
Margaret Comes1/20/2022 3:39:49 PMAttached are Comments of Rockland Electric CompanyDocket No. QO21071023 Comments Rockland Electric Company 1-20-2022
John Kolesnik 1/20/2022 3:15:38 PMPlease see attached document for Energy Efficiency Alliance of New Jersey Comments on Benchmarking ProposalEEA-NJ Benchmarking Straw Proposal Commnets
Patricia Hanley, BOMA Association Executive1/20/2022 1:55:14 PMBOMA NJ Comments Uploaded to BPU January 20, 2022 BPU Docket No. QO21071023 Dear Secretary Camacho-Welch: On behalf of BOMA NJ, the Building Owners and Managers Association of New Jersey, thank you for the opportunity to share our comments and concerns relative to the Board of Public Utilities’ Building Energy and Water Benchmarking Straw Proposal. BOMA NJ acknowledges that climate change is real, and we commend the BPU and Governor Murphy’s Administration for efforts to minimize its damaging effects on the natural and built environments, and our citizens. We consider energy benchmarking a valuable tool that provides building owners and managers with information needed to implement and evaluate efficiency measures. Many of our members have been benchmarking for some time, and are very focused on building performance and sustainability due to ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance), a global business consideration of increasing importance to commercial real estate as investors are evaluating these non-financial factors as they analyze risks and growth opportunities. However, members have raised concerns about the Straw Proposal’s “Public Disclosure” and “BPU” data disclosure requirements. We understand that, currently, the EPA simply requires third-party certification for Energy Star Building Labels, and we recommend that the New Jersey program do the same. Given that Energy Star Scores (half being above average and half being below average) are often misunderstood or misinterpreted by the general public, we see no value (only potential negative consequences) in “displaying a poster in the building”. The “building-level database” should be an opt-in choice, and the “program report” should include information in the aggregate, with specific buildings identified only if the owner agrees. Also, “transactional disclosure” should apply only upon the buyer’s request during its sale contract due diligence period. Finally, and appreciative of the potential benefits of requiring BPU disclosure of scores or its access to any EPA Portfolio Manager Energy Star benchmarking account data, for security and privacy concerns, disclosure of this nature should be an opt-in choice. We also caution the BPU that fines and high costs (time and money) for compliance are counterproductive in an already expensive and overly regulated state. By the BPU’s own admission, significant training and education will be required for everyone involved in this process (owners and managers, utilities, and consultants). Requiring benchmarking compliance for participation in other BPU programs and incentives may be reasonable, making a building’s compliance status public when non-compliance may be due to a clerical error or an appeal is not reasonable. Thank you for your consideration. BOMA NJ looks forward to serving as a resource as the BPU finalizes and implements this program. Sincerely, Patricia Hanley BOMA Association Executive 
Sheree L. Kelly1/20/2022 1:34:53 PMPlease see the attached document for South Jersey Gas and Elizabethtown Gas Comments on Benchmarking Proposal.QO21071023 BPU Energy Water Benchmarking Initiative Comments - SJG_ETG
Amanda Clevinger1/20/2022 12:39:48 PMBright Power offers the following comments RE IN THE MATTER OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF P.L. 2018, c.17 ENERGY AND WATER BENCHMARKING OF COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS Docket No. QO21071023.Docket QO21071023 BP RE Energy and Water Benchmarking of Commercial Buildings 1.20.22
Erin Cosgrove1/20/2022 10:55:21 AMPlease see attached document for Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships Comments on Benchmarking Proposal,NEEP_NJ_BPU_Benchmarking_Comment
John 1/19/2022 5:28:05 PMPlease accept the attached comments on the Straw Proposal to implement the Clean Energy Act of 2018 benchmarking provisions. Let me know if they do not go through. Thank you. HCANJ Clean Energy Act of 2018 Benchmarking Requirement Comments
Chris Baker1/19/2022 4:40:52 PMComments in memoBenchmarking Comments from Willdan
Michael McGuinness1/19/2022 4:02:43 PMDear Secretary Camacho-Welch: On behalf of the 820 members of NAIOP NJ, the Commercial Real Estate Development Association, thank you for the opportunity to share our comments and concerns relative to the Board of Public Utilities’ Building Energy and Water Benchmarking Straw Proposal. NAIOP NJ acknowledges that climate change is real, and we commend the BPU and Governor Murphy’s Administration for efforts to minimize its damaging effects on the natural and built environments, and our citizens. We consider energy benchmarking a valuable tool that provides building owners and managers with information needed to implement and evaluate efficiency measures. Many of our members have been benchmarking for some time, and are very focused on building performance and sustainability due to ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance), a global business consideration of increasing importance to commercial real estate as investors are evaluating these non-financial factors as they analyze risks and growth opportunities. However, members have raised concerns about the Straw Proposal’s “Public Disclosure” requirements. We understand that, currently, the EPA simply requires third-party certification for Energy Star Building Labels, and we recommend that the New Jersey program do the same. Given that Energy Star Scores (half being above average and half being below average) are often misunderstood or misinterpreted by the general public, we see no value (only potential negative consequences) in “displaying a poster in the building”. The “building-level database” should be an opt-in choice, and the “program report” should include information in the aggregate, with specific buildings identified only if the owner agrees. We also caution the BPU that fines and high costs (time and money) for compliance are counterproductive in an already expensive and overly regulated state. By the BPU’s own admission, significant training and education will be required for everyone involved in this process (owners and managers, utilities, and consultants). Requiring benchmarking compliance for participation in other BPU programs and incentives may be reasonable, making a building’s compliance status public when non-compliance may be due to a clerical error or an appeal is not reasonable. Thank you for your consideration. NAIOP NJ looks forward to serving as a resource as the BPU finalizes and implements this program. Sincerely, Michael G. McGuinness Chief Executive Officer  
Danielle Lopez9/23/2021 12:02:16 PMPSE&G Comments regarding the establishment of the School and Small Business Energy Efficiency Stimulus Program2021-09-23 - School Small Business EE Comments - PSEG - Lopez

Follow NJBPU on Social Media

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Instagram YouTube
NJBPU on Twitter
NJBPU on Facebook
Statewide: NJ Home | Services A to Z | Departments/Agencies | FAQs
BPU: Home | About BPU | Commercial Customers | Residential Customers | Newsroom | Customer Assistance | Board Agenda Business | Related Links